Sacco C, Braghiroli A, Grossi E, Donner C F
Division of Pulmonary Disease, Clinica del Lavoro Foundation, Medical Center of Rehabilitation, Veruno (NO), Italy.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 1995 Apr;50(2):98-103.
Theophylline is known to alter sleep architecture because of its affinity to adenosine receptors. One of the consequences of disrupted sleep is impaired cognitive performance. A single-blind, randomized cross-over study of eight male chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients was undertaken to evaluate the effects of theophylline versus doxofylline on sleep architecture. The patients, who were all ex-smokers, had been treated with theophylline. Mean age was 53 +/- 12 yrs, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 50 +/- 22% predicted and forced vital capacity (FVC) 70 +/- 18% predicted. Following a wash-out period, four patients were given oral slow-release theophylline (T) (300 mg b.i.d.) for one week, followed by a cross-over to doxofylline (D) (400 mg t.i.d.) for a second week. The other four patients were given the drugs in the reverse order. All patients underwent polysomnography at baseline and at the end of each week of treatment. The number of arousals per hour was 5.5 +/- 2.9 at baseline, 9.4 +/- 5.2 during T treatment and 5.4 +/- 4.4 during D treatment. During T treatment, sleep efficiency was 60 +/- 19% vs 75 +/- 13% recorded at baseline trial and 68 +/- 25 recorded during D treatment. Sleep quality, during T treatment, was poorer than at baseline, with a greater increase in the percentage of wakefulness and more stage 2 sleep than at baseline. Slow wave sleep was reduced with both treatments, particularly D. Neither drug affected the arterial oxygen saturation (Sao2) or respiratory rate during sleep.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
已知茶碱因其对腺苷受体的亲和力会改变睡眠结构。睡眠中断的后果之一是认知能力受损。对8名男性慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者进行了一项单盲、随机交叉研究,以评估茶碱与多索茶碱对睡眠结构的影响。这些患者均为既往吸烟者,曾接受过茶碱治疗。平均年龄为53±12岁,一秒用力呼气量(FEV1)为预测值的50±22%,用力肺活量(FVC)为预测值的70±18%。经过洗脱期后,4名患者口服缓释茶碱(T)(300mg,每日两次),持续一周,然后交叉服用多索茶碱(D)(400mg,每日三次),持续第二周。另外4名患者则按相反顺序服用药物。所有患者在基线期以及治疗的每周末均接受多导睡眠图检查。每小时觉醒次数在基线期为5.5±2.9次,T治疗期间为9.4±5.2次,D治疗期间为5.4±4.4次。在T治疗期间,睡眠效率为60±19%,而基线试验时为75±13%,D治疗期间为68±25%。T治疗期间的睡眠质量比基线期差,清醒百分比增加更多,且2期睡眠比基线期更多。两种治疗均使慢波睡眠减少,尤其是D治疗。两种药物均未影响睡眠期间的动脉血氧饱和度(Sao2)或呼吸频率。(摘要截选至250字)