Kumar S, Sherman S, Hawes R H, Lehman G A
Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202-5250, USA.
Gastrointest Endosc. 1995 May;41(5):445-7. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)80001-x.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) has been shown to be an accurate and reliable method to evaluate biliary and pancreatic disorders. When an attempt to perform ERCP fails, the managing physician must decide whether to repeat the procedure or rely on other alternatives. We tallied the data from 113 patients referred to our institution for repeat ERCP after a failed attempt at another hospital. This group represented approximately 5% of the total population studied during that period of time. All of the patients had undergone one or more unsuccessful ERCP(s) and were referred to our center for another attempt at ERCP. Using a variety of techniques, we were successful in cannulating the desired duct in 96% of attempts. Pathologic findings were present in 64% of cases, of which 22% were sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Thus, second attempt ERCP is generally worthwhile if clinically indicated and ERCP expertise is geographically available.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)已被证明是评估胆道和胰腺疾病的一种准确且可靠的方法。当尝试进行ERCP失败时,主治医生必须决定是重复该操作还是依靠其他替代方法。我们统计了113例在另一家医院首次尝试ERCP失败后转诊至我院进行再次ERCP的患者的数据。该组患者约占那段时间研究的总人口的5%。所有患者均经历过一次或多次不成功的ERCP,并被转诊至我们中心再次尝试ERCP。通过使用多种技术,我们在96%的尝试中成功插管至所需胆管。64%的病例有病理发现,其中22%为Oddi括约肌功能障碍。因此,如果有临床指征且当地有ERCP专业技术,再次尝试ERCP通常是值得的。