Hashmi P, Ho C, Morgan S, Stephenson J R
Department of Microbiology, St Helier Trust Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey.
J Clin Pathol. 1995 Apr;48(4):383-4. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.4.383.
The performance of two commercially available urine dipstick tests was evaluated to exclude significant bacteriuria in midstream urine samples from patients attending a renal transplant outpatient clinic. The use of dipsticks to reduce the necessity for routine microscopy and culture was also assessed. Consecutive urine samples (n = 497) from 121 patients were examined for leucocytes, nitrite, and blood with Multistix* 10SG (Ames) and Nephur test (Boehring) dipsticks. All urine samples also underwent routine microscopy and culture. The sensitivities of the Nephur test and Multistix were 83% and 82%, respectively; the specificities were 28% and 40%, respectively; the negative predictive values were 85% and 88%, respectively; and the positive predictive values were 24% and 29%, respectively. Underlying conditions and treatments in renal patients may have led to relatively low sensitivity and positive predictive values. Traditional microscopy and culture methods are more reliable for renal transplant recipients.
对两种市售尿液试纸检测进行评估,以排除肾移植门诊患者中段尿样本中的显著菌尿症。同时还评估了使用试纸以减少常规显微镜检查和培养必要性的情况。使用Multistix* 10SG(艾姆斯公司)和Nephur检测(勃林格公司)试纸对121例患者的连续尿样(n = 497)进行白细胞、亚硝酸盐和血液检测。所有尿样也都进行了常规显微镜检查和培养。Nephur检测和Multistix的灵敏度分别为83%和82%;特异性分别为28%和40%;阴性预测值分别为85%和88%;阳性预测值分别为24%和29%。肾病患者的基础疾病和治疗可能导致了相对较低的灵敏度和阳性预测值。传统的显微镜检查和培养方法对肾移植受者更为可靠。