• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用科尔布学习风格量表对实习护士的学习风格进行评估。

The assessment of student nurse learning styles using the Kolb Learning Styles Inventory.

作者信息

Cavanagh S J, Hogan K, Ramgopal T

出版信息

Nurse Educ Today. 1995 Jun;15(3):177-83. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(95)80103-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0260-6917(95)80103-0
PMID:7616940
Abstract

The learning styles of 192 Registered General Nursing/DipHE students was determined using the Kolb Learning Styles Inventory prior to the students having any formal contact with lecturing staff. The percentage of students having a predominantly concrete learning style was 53.7%, while 46.3% were predominantly reflective. This finding is in keeping with those of Laschinger & Boss (1984), who suggest that they are supportive of Kolb's theoretical tenet that concrete learners tend to choose people-oriented professions. Chi-squared tests were used to determine if the respondent's learning styles varied with either age, sex or having been in employment prior to becoming a nursing student; no statistically significant associations were found. A further chi-squared analysis was performed to see if there was a relationship between learning style and those students who possessed: 1) only the DC test, 2) O-levels as highest qualifications, and 3) A-levels as highest qualifications--no statistically significant associations were found. There remain measurement problems with the Kolb inventory, and a discussion of some of these issues are presented. The findings have reinforced the need for using a variety of delivery styles with students, with an emphasis on participation and experiential learning. This need for variety is essential given the distribution of learning styles found with the students. Nurse educators are urged to re-examine perceptions and assumptions about student learning needs.

摘要

在192名注册普通护理/高等教育文凭学生与授课教师进行任何正式接触之前,使用科尔布学习风格量表确定了他们的学习风格。主要具有具体学习风格的学生比例为53.7%,而主要具有反思性学习风格的学生比例为46.3%。这一发现与拉辛格和博斯(1984年)的研究结果一致,他们认为这支持了科尔布的理论信条,即具体学习者倾向于选择以人为本的职业。使用卡方检验来确定受访者的学习风格是否因年龄、性别或在成为护理学生之前是否有工作经历而有所不同;未发现具有统计学意义的关联。进行了进一步的卡方分析,以查看学习风格与以下学生之间是否存在关系:1)仅拥有文凭补充测试,2)以普通中等教育证书作为最高学历,3)以高级水平考试作为最高学历——未发现具有统计学意义的关联。科尔布量表仍然存在测量问题,并对其中一些问题进行了讨论。研究结果强化了对学生采用多种教学方式的必要性,重点是参与和体验式学习。鉴于学生中发现的学习风格分布情况,这种多样化的需求至关重要。敦促护理教育工作者重新审视对学生学习需求的看法和假设。

相似文献

1
The assessment of student nurse learning styles using the Kolb Learning Styles Inventory.使用科尔布学习风格量表对实习护士的学习风格进行评估。
Nurse Educ Today. 1995 Jun;15(3):177-83. doi: 10.1016/s0260-6917(95)80103-0.
2
Learning styles of first-year undergraduate nursing and midwifery students: a cross-sectional survey utilising the Kolb Learning Style Inventory.本科护生和助产学新生学习风格的研究:利用 Kolb 学习风格量表的横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2012 Jul;32(5):506-15. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.08.001. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
3
Learning styles of nursing students and career choices.护理专业学生的学习风格与职业选择。
J Adv Nurs. 1984 Jul;9(4):375-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1984.tb00386.x.
4
Kolb's Learning Style Inventory: a review of its applications in nursing research.科尔布学习风格量表:其在护理研究中的应用综述
J Nurs Educ. 1990 May;29(5):202-7. doi: 10.3928/01484834-19900501-04.
5
A multi-centre study of learning styles of new nursing students.一项针对新入职护理专业学生学习风格的多中心研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 Jan;31(1-2):111-120. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15888. Epub 2021 May 30.
6
Assessing learning styles of Saudi dental students using Kolb's Learning Style Inventory.采用 Kolb 学习风格量表评估沙特牙科学生的学习风格。
J Dent Educ. 2014 Jun;78(6):927-33.
7
Learning styles of nursing students and environmental press perceptions of two clinical nursing settings.
J Adv Nurs. 1986 May;11(3):289-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1986.tb01250.x.
8
Learning style preferences of Australian accelerated postgraduate pre-registration nursing students: A cross-sectional survey.澳大利亚加速研究生预注册护理专业学生的学习风格偏好:一项横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2018 Jan;28:280-284. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
9
Learning styles of allied health students using Kolb's LSI-IIa.使用科尔布学习风格量表-IIa评估的健康相关专业学生的学习风格
J Allied Health. 2005 Fall;34(3):177-82.
10
Students' academic performance in nursing as a function of student and faculty learning style congruency.学生在护理专业的学业成绩与学生和教师学习风格匹配度的关系。
J Nurs Educ. 1996 Feb;35(2):69-73. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19960201-06.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of simulation maket in nursing education and the determination of learning style of students.护理教育中模拟市场的评估及学生学习风格的确定。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jul-Sep;11(3):74-79.
2
The evaluation of simulation market in nursing education and the determination of learning style of students.护理教育中模拟市场的评估及学生学习风格的确定。
Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):1-6.
3
"The educating nursing staff effectively (TENSE) study": design of a cluster randomized controlled trial.“有效教育护理人员(TENSE)研究”:一项群组随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Nurs. 2014 Dec 19;13(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12912-014-0046-6. eCollection 2014.
4
The learning type makes the difference - the interrelation of Kolb's learning styles and psychological status of preclinical medical students at the University of Erlangen.学习类型产生差异——埃尔朗根大学临床前医学生的科尔布学习风格与心理状态的相互关系
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2014 Nov 17;31(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma000934. eCollection 2014.
5
Does learning style influence academic performance in different forms of assessment?学习风格是否会影响不同评估形式的学业成绩?
J Anat. 2014 Mar;224(3):304-8. doi: 10.1111/joa.12126. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
6
Patient-centred communication intervention study to evaluate nurse-patient interactions in complex continuing care.以患者为中心的沟通干预研究评估复杂延续护理中的护患互动。
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Oct 11;12:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-61.
7
A Nationwide Learning-Style Assessment of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students in CAAHEP-Accredited Athletic Training Programs.对美国高等院校健康与体育教育认证委员会(CAAHEP)认证的运动训练专业本科学生的全国性学习风格评估。
J Athl Train. 2002 Dec;37(4 Suppl):S141-S146.
8
An Investigation of Undergraduate Athletic Training Students' Learning Styles and Program Admission Success.本科运动训练专业学生学习风格与项目录取成功率的调查
J Athl Train. 2001 Jun;36(2):130-135.