Brignole M, Menozzi C, Bottoni N, Gianfranchi L, Lolli G, Oddone D, Gaggioli G
Section of Arrhythmology, Ospedali Riuniti, Lavagna, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Aug 1;76(4):273-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80080-0.
Transient bradycardia may be intrinsic because of sinus node or atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities, or extrinsic because of abnormal vagal reflex. Twenty-five consecutive patients, referred to us for study of unexplained syncope, who, during electrocardiographic monitoring, had a documented episode of intermittent bradycardia that caused syncope, underwent a full electrophysiologic study, carotid sinus massage, and the head-up tilt test. A prolonged ventricular asystole (5 to 20 seconds) was documented during syncope in all patients: sinus arrest in 13, AV block in 7, sinus arrest plus AV block in 3, and asystolic pause during atrial fibrillation in 2. Abnormal electrophysiologic findings suggested the correct diagnosis in 6 patients (24%): block within the bundle of His in 5 and sick sinus syndrome in 1. An abnormal response to carotid sinus massage or to the head-up tilt test suggested a neurally mediated mechanism in 17 patients (68%). Overall, electrophysiologic study and vasovagal maneuvers were able to identify the mechanism of spontaneous syncope in 23 patients (92%). Thus, in patients affected by syncope due to transient bradycardia, the most likely mechanism of syncope is neurogenic, whereas it is cardiogenic only in a few instances. Electrophysiologic testing, carotid sinus massage, and the head-up tilt test can identify most of these patients. Conversely, when all these tests are negative, it is unlikely that transient bradycardia is the cause of syncope. Because of the different mechanisms involved, electrophysiologic study and vasovagal maneuvers are complementary diagnostic tools.
短暂性心动过缓可能是由于窦房结或房室传导异常导致的内在性原因,也可能是由于异常迷走反射引起的外在性原因。连续25例因不明原因晕厥前来我院研究的患者,在心电图监测期间记录到有间歇性心动过缓发作并导致晕厥,这些患者均接受了全面的电生理检查、颈动脉窦按摩及头高位倾斜试验。所有患者在晕厥期间均记录到心室停搏延长(5至20秒):13例为窦性停搏,7例为房室传导阻滞,3例为窦性停搏加房室传导阻滞,2例为房颤时的停搏间歇。异常的电生理检查结果在6例患者(24%)中提示了正确诊断:5例为希氏束内阻滞,1例为病态窦房结综合征。对颈动脉窦按摩或头高位倾斜试验的异常反应在17例患者(68%)中提示了神经介导机制。总体而言,电生理检查和血管迷走神经操作能够在23例患者(92%)中识别出自发性晕厥的机制。因此,在因短暂性心动过缓导致晕厥的患者中,晕厥最可能的机制是神经源性的,而仅在少数情况下是心源性的。电生理检查、颈动脉窦按摩及头高位倾斜试验能够识别出大多数此类患者。相反,当所有这些检查均为阴性时,短暂性心动过缓不太可能是晕厥的原因。由于涉及不同的机制,电生理检查和血管迷走神经操作是互补的诊断工具。