Kurz A, Sessler D I, Annadata R, Dechert M, Christensen R, Bjorksten A R
Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0648, USA.
Anesth Analg. 1995 Aug;81(2):393-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199508000-00032.
Perioperative hypothermia usually results largely from pharmacologic inhibition of normal thermoregulatory control. Midazolam is a commonly used sedative and anesthetic adjuvant whose thermoregulatory effects are unknown. We therefore tested the hypothesis that midazolam administration impairs thermoregulatory control. Eight volunteers were studied on 2 days each, once without drug and once at a target total plasma midazolam concentration of 0.3 micrograms/mL (corresponding to administration of approximately 40 mg over approximately 4 h). Each day, skin and core temperatures were increased sufficiently to provoke sweating, and then reduced to elicit peripheral vasoconstriction and shivering. We mathematically compensated for changes in skin temperature using the established linear cutaneous contributions to control of each response. From these calculated thresholds (core temperatures triggering responses at a designated skin temperature of 34 degrees C), we determined the thermoregulatory effects of midazolam. The sweating threshold was decreased approximately 0.3 degrees C by midazolam administration: 37.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C vs 37.0 +/- 0.3 degrees C (P = 0.0004, paired t-test). Midazolam decreased the core temperature that triggered vasoconstriction somewhat more: 37.1 +/- 0.2 degrees C vs 36.3 +/- 0.5 degrees C (P = 0.0002). Similarly, midazolam decreased the shivering threshold: 35.9 +/- 0.3 degrees C vs 35.3 +/- 0.6 degrees C (P = 0.03). The sweating-to-vasoconstriction (interthreshold) range, therefore, increased from 0.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C to 0.7 +/- 0.3 degrees C (P = 0.002). Although statistically significant, this relatively small increase contrasts markedly with the 3-5 degrees C interthreshold ranges produced by clinical doses of volatile anesthetics, propofol, and opioids.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
围手术期体温过低通常很大程度上是由对正常体温调节控制的药物抑制所致。咪达唑仑是一种常用的镇静剂和麻醉辅助药物,其体温调节作用尚不清楚。因此,我们检验了给予咪达唑仑会损害体温调节控制这一假设。对8名志愿者进行了研究,每人研究2天,一天不使用药物,另一天将血浆咪达唑仑总浓度目标设定为0.3微克/毫升(相当于约4小时内给予约40毫克)。每天,先将皮肤和核心温度充分升高以引发出汗,然后再降低以引发外周血管收缩和寒战。我们使用已确定的线性皮肤对每种反应控制的贡献,对皮肤温度变化进行数学补偿。根据这些计算出的阈值(在指定皮肤温度34摄氏度时触发反应的核心温度),我们确定了咪达唑仑的体温调节作用。给予咪达唑仑使出汗阈值降低约0.3摄氏度:分别为37.3±0.2摄氏度和37.0±0.3摄氏度(P = 0.0004,配对t检验)。咪达唑仑使触发血管收缩的核心温度降低得更多一些:分别为37.1±0.2摄氏度和36.3±0.5摄氏度(P = 0.0002)。同样,咪达唑仑降低了寒战阈值:分别为35.9±0.3摄氏度和35.3±0.6摄氏度(P = 0.03)。因此,出汗至血管收缩(阈值间)范围从0.2±0.1摄氏度增加到0.7±0.3摄氏度(P = 0.002)。尽管具有统计学显著性,但这种相对较小的增加与临床剂量的挥发性麻醉剂、丙泊酚和阿片类药物产生的3 - 5摄氏度阈值间范围形成了明显对比。(摘要截断于250字)