• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[健康受试者、吸烟者和非吸烟者鼻黏膜纤毛功能的对比试验]

[The comparative test of nasal mucociliary function in healthy subjects, smokers and non-smokers].

作者信息

Alfaro Monge J M, Soda Merhy A

机构信息

Departmento de ORL, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias, M éxico, D. F. M éxico.

出版信息

Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1995 May-Jun;46(3):187-9.

PMID:7619552
Abstract

Little is known about the changes produced in the nasal respiratory epithelium in individuals with an important smoking habit. The purpose of this study is to compare the nasal mucociliary function in healthy subjects, smokers and non-smokers. The nasal mucociliary transport of aspartame particles was measured in 50 healthy non-smokers and in 50 healthy smokers under similar conditions. The average time taken for the displacement of the test substance from the middle third of the inferior turbinate to the oropharynx was found to be in the smokers 13.62 min., and in the non-smokers, 10.34 min. The results were compared using student's "t" test and a significant difference (p < 0.001) was found between both groups. This result is taken as a simple clinical test that evaluates the smoking effects on the nasal mucociliary function.

摘要

对于有严重吸烟习惯的个体,其鼻呼吸上皮所产生的变化了解甚少。本研究的目的是比较健康受试者、吸烟者和非吸烟者的鼻黏液纤毛功能。在相似条件下,对50名健康非吸烟者和50名健康吸烟者测量了阿斯巴甜颗粒的鼻黏液纤毛运输。发现测试物质从下鼻甲中三分之一处移动到口咽的平均时间,吸烟者为13.62分钟,非吸烟者为10.34分钟。使用学生“t”检验对结果进行比较,发现两组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.001)。该结果被视为一项评估吸烟对鼻黏液纤毛功能影响的简单临床测试。

相似文献

1
[The comparative test of nasal mucociliary function in healthy subjects, smokers and non-smokers].[健康受试者、吸烟者和非吸烟者鼻黏膜纤毛功能的对比试验]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1995 May-Jun;46(3):187-9.
2
Short-term effects of nCPAP on nasal mucociliary clearance and mucus transportability in healthy subjects.无创持续气道正压通气对健康受试者鼻黏膜纤毛清除功能和黏液运输能力的短期影响。
Respir Med. 2006 Jan;100(1):183-5. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.03.042.
3
Nasal mucus clearance in chronic smokers.慢性吸烟者的鼻腔黏液清除功能
Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 1994 Jul-Sep;36(3):133-6.
4
[Influence of smoking on the nasal mucosa mucociliary transport].[吸烟对鼻黏膜黏液纤毛运输的影响]
Acta Med Croatica. 2014 Jun;68(3):247-51.
5
Effect of bidi smoking on nasal mucociliary clearance: a comparative study.比迪烟吸烟对鼻黏液纤毛清除功能的影响:一项对比研究。
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Dec;132(12):1077-1082. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118002049. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
6
Effects of long-term nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy on morphology, function, and mucociliary clearance of nasal epithelium in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.长期经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者鼻上皮形态、功能及黏液纤毛清除功能的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2004 Aug;114(8):1431-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200408000-00022.
7
Comparison of the effects of radiofrequency tissue ablation, CO2 laser ablation, and partial turbinectomy applications on nasal mucociliary functions.射频组织消融、二氧化碳激光消融和部分鼻甲切除术对鼻黏膜纤毛功能影响的比较。
Laryngoscope. 2003 Mar;113(3):514-9. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200303000-00022.
8
Reversibility of impaired nasal mucociliary clearance in smokers following a smoking cessation programme.戒烟计划后吸烟者鼻黏膜纤毛清除功能障碍的可逆性。
Respirology. 2011 Jul;16(5):849-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2011.01985.x.
9
[Functional nasal tests for the evaluation of the mucociliary transport].[用于评估黏液纤毛运输的功能性鼻腔测试]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1996 Sep-Oct;47(5):363-6.
10
Nasal mucociliary clearance in total laryngectomized patients.全喉切除患者的鼻黏液纤毛清除功能
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006 Dec;263(12):1099-104. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0111-1. Epub 2006 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of smoking and smoking cessation on nasal mucociliary clearance, mucus properties and inflammation.吸烟及戒烟对鼻黏膜纤毛清除功能、黏液特性及炎症的影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 Jul;71(6):344-50. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(06)10.