Heartsink patients: a study of their general practitioners.

BACKGROUND

A number of attempts have been made to investigate the heartsink, difficult, dysphoric or problem patient. Most studies have emphasized the role which the patient plays in evoking despair, anger and frustration in the doctor. However, one doctor's list of difficult patients may not necessarily be the same as another's.

AIM

A study was undertaken to determine if the individual characteristics of general practitioners are associated with the number of heartsink patients they report on their patient lists.

METHOD

Sixty out of 137 urban general practitioners drawn at random from the Sheffield Family Health Services Authority list were surveyed by structured interview and questionnaires in 1990. Outcome measures were interview data and scores on the 12-item general health questionnaire, Warr-Cook-Wall job satisfaction scale and the Bortner personality profile measure.

RESULTS

Sixty per cent of the variance in the number of heartsink patients that general practitioners reported on their lists could be accounted for by the following four explanatory variables: greater perceived workload; lower job satisfaction; lack of training in counselling and/or communication skills; and lack of appropriate postgraduate qualifications. No other variables considered could account for the variance in the number of heartsink patients reported by general practitioners.

CONCLUSION

The individual characteristics of doctors are associated with the number of heartsink patients reported by general practitioners. To reduce the number of such patients experienced, it may be necessary for general practitioners to reduce their workload and increase their job satisfaction and their level of relevant postgraduate training.