Aschoff A, Kremer P, Benesch C, Fruh K, Klank A, Kunze S
Neurochirurgische Universitätsklinik, Heidelberg, Germany.
Childs Nerv Syst. 1995 Apr;11(4):193-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00277653.
When vertical body position is simulated, conventional differential pressure valves show an absolutely unphysiological flow, which is 2-170 times the normal liquor production rate. Although this is compensated in part by the resistance of the silicon tubes, which may produce up to 94% of the resistance of the complete shunt system, a negative intracranial pressure (ICP) of up to 30-44 cmH2O is an unavoidable consequence, which can be followed by subdural hematomas, slit ventricles, and other well-known complications. Modern shunt technology offers programmable, hydrostatic, and "flow-controlled" valves and anti-siphon devices; we have tested 13 different designs from 7 manufacturers (56 specimens), using the "Heidelberg Valve Test Inventory" with 16 subtests. "Programmable" valves reduce, but cannot exclude, unphysiological flow rates: even in the highest position and in combination with a standard catheter typical programmable Medos-Hakim valves allow a flow of 93-232 ml/h, Sophy SU-8-valves 86-168 ml/h with 30 cmH2O. The effect of hydrostatic valves (Hakim-Lumbar, Chhabra) can be inactivated by movements of daily life. The weight of the metal balls in most valves was too low for adequate flow reduction. Antisiphon devices are highly dependent on external, i.e. subcutaneous, pressure which has unpredictable influences on shunt function, and clinically is sometimes followed by shunt insufficiency. Two new Orbis-Sigma valves showed relatively physiological flow rates even when the vertical position (30 cmH2O) was simulated. One showed an insufficient flow (5.7 ml/h), and one was primarily obstructed. These have by far the smallest outlet of all valves. Additionally, the ruby pin tends to stick. Therefore, a high susceptibility to obliterations and blockade is unavoidable. Encouraging results obtained in pediatric patients contrast with disappointing experiences in some German and Swedish hospitals, which suggests that our laboratory findings are confirmed by clinical results. The concept of strict flow limitation seems to be inadaequate for adult patients, who need a relatively high flow during (nocturnal) ICP crises. The problem of shunt overdrainage remains unsolved.
当模拟垂直体位时,传统的压差阀会显示出完全不符合生理的流量,这是正常脑脊液生成速率的2至170倍。尽管这在一定程度上会被硅管的阻力所补偿,硅管的阻力可能占整个分流系统阻力的94%,但高达30 - 44 cmH₂O的颅内负压(ICP)是不可避免的后果,随后可能会出现硬膜下血肿、裂隙脑室以及其他众所周知的并发症。现代分流技术提供了可编程、静水压和“流量控制”的阀门以及防虹吸装置;我们使用包含16个分测试的“海德堡阀门测试清单”,对来自7家制造商的13种不同设计(56个样本)进行了测试。“可编程”阀门可降低但不能排除不符合生理的流速:即使在最高位置并与标准导管结合使用,典型的可编程Medos - Hakim阀门允许的流量为93 - 232 ml/h,Sophy SU - 8阀门在30 cmH₂O时为86 - 168 ml/h。静水压阀门(Hakim - Lumbar、Chhabra)的效果会因日常生活中的活动而失效。大多数阀门中金属球的重量过低,无法充分减少流量。防虹吸装置高度依赖外部压力,即皮下压力,这对分流功能有不可预测的影响,临床上有时会导致分流功能不全。两种新型的Orbis - Sigma阀门即使在模拟垂直体位(30 cmH₂O)时也显示出相对符合生理的流速。一个显示流量不足(5.7 ml/h),另一个主要发生堵塞。在所有阀门中,它们的出口是最小的。此外,红宝石销容易卡住。因此,不可避免地对闭塞和堵塞高度敏感。在儿科患者中获得的令人鼓舞的结果与一些德国和瑞典医院令人失望的经验形成对比,这表明我们的实验室结果得到了临床结果的证实。严格的流量限制概念似乎不适用于成年患者,他们在(夜间)颅内压危机期间需要相对较高的流量。分流过度引流的问题仍然没有解决。