Suppr超能文献

对中国女性进行的肌肉注射美施孕、环丙孕酮复合剂及一号避孕针的多中心III期比较临床试验。II. 出血模式比较

A multicentred phase III comparative clinical trial of Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1 given by intramuscular injection to Chinese women. II. The comparison of bleeding patterns.

作者信息

Sang G W, Shao Q X, Ge R S, Ge J L, Chen J K, Song S, Fang K J, He M L, Luo S Y, Chen S F

机构信息

WHO CCR for Human Reproduction, Family Planning Research Institute of Zheijang, Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Contraception. 1995 Mar;51(3):185-92. doi: 10.1016/0010-7824(95)00014-2.

Abstract

Between 1988 and 1992, a randomized phase III clinical trial was conducted in China to compare three monthly injectable contraceptives: Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the menstrual diaries provided by 5098 (89%) of the subjects. In total, 902, 903 and 913 diaries were analyzed to compare bleeding patterns induced by Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1. The first withdrawal bleeding usually occurs 14-20 days after the first injection for all three of these preparations. Thereafter, 50% of Mesigyna users had precisely 3 bleeding/spotting episodes every 90 days, 50% of Cyclofem users had 2-3 and 50% of Injectable No. 1 users had 3-4 episodes every 90 days. Relative to users of Mesigyna or Cyclofem, Injectable No. 1 users had 2-3 more bleeding/spotting days, and a shorter length of bleeding/spotting-free intervals in each period. 63.7%, 41.4% and 60.6% of subjects using Mesigyna, Cyclofem and Injectable No. 1, respectively, had bleeding patterns similar to their untreated patterns in the first 90-day period. The percentages increased to 82.2% 67.8% and 75.0% in the fourth 90-day period. A total of 1815 diaries for Mesigyna and 1802 for Cyclofem were analyzed for more in depth comparison of these two methods. The number of bleeding/spotting days over four periods showed little difference between the two group, but there were more spotting days and there was greater individual variability among Cyclofem users.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

1988年至1992年期间,中国进行了一项随机III期临床试验,比较三种每月注射用避孕药:美施孕、环孕诺和1号避孕针。本文对5098名(89%)受试者提供的月经日记进行了详细分析。总共分析了902份、903份和913份日记,以比较美施孕、环孕诺和1号避孕针引起的出血模式。这三种制剂首次注射后,首次撤药性出血通常在14 - 20天出现。此后,50%的美施孕使用者每90天恰好有3次出血/点滴出血发作,50%的环孕诺使用者每90天有2 - 3次,50%的1号避孕针使用者每90天有3 - 4次。与美施孕或环孕诺使用者相比,1号避孕针使用者的出血/点滴出血天数多2 - 3天,且每个周期的无出血/点滴出血间隔时间更短。使用美施孕、环孕诺和1号避孕针的受试者在第一个90天期间,分别有63.7%、41.4%和60.6%的出血模式与其未治疗时的模式相似。在第四个90天期间,这一比例分别增至82.2%、67.8%和75.0%。对1815份美施孕日记和1802份环孕诺日记进行了分析,以更深入地比较这两种方法。两组在四个周期内的出血/点滴出血天数差异不大,但环孕诺使用者的点滴出血天数更多,个体差异更大。(摘要截取自250词)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验