• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Assessing agreement between clinical measurement methods.

作者信息

Liehr P, Dedo Y L, Torres S, Meininger J C

机构信息

Health Science Center, School of Nursing, University of Texas-Houston 77030, USA.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 1995 May-Jun;24(3):240-5. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80043-3.

DOI:10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80043-3
PMID:7622398
Abstract

Nursing practice and research often require the use of one measurement method in place of another, creating the need to know how well one clinical measurement method approximates another. The usual statistical analyses for assessing agreement between measurement methods are the correlation coefficient and the paired t test. This article suggests that these statistical methods do not address the question of agreement. It proposes the limits of agreement as a more informative analysis when a researcher is interested in replacing one measurement method with another. The application of limits of agreement analysis to assess repeatability of one measurement method is also introduced.

摘要

相似文献

1
Assessing agreement between clinical measurement methods.
Heart Lung. 1995 May-Jun;24(3):240-5. doi: 10.1016/s0147-9563(05)80043-3.
2
A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement.关于组内相关系数在评估两种测量方法之间一致性时的应用说明。
Comput Biol Med. 1990;20(5):337-40. doi: 10.1016/0010-4825(90)90013-f.
3
Assessing accurate BP measurement: size and technique matter!
Nursing. 2015 Apr;45(4):16-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000461838.55540.6e.
4
Indirect blood pressure measurement: a need to reassess.间接血压测量:需要重新评估。
Am J Crit Care. 1993 Jul;2(4):272-7; quiz 278-9.
5
Random zero sphygmomanometer versus automatic oscillometric blood pressure monitor; is either the instrument of choice?随机零位血压计与自动振荡式血压监测仪;哪一种是首选仪器?
J Hum Hypertens. 1995 Nov;9(11):885-9.
6
Comparing heteroscedastic measurement systems with the probability of agreement.比较异方差测量系统与一致性概率。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Nov;27(11):3420-3435. doi: 10.1177/0962280217702540. Epub 2017 May 8.
7
Assessing agreement between two measurement systems: An alternative to the limits of agreement approach.评估两种测量系统之间的一致性:一致性界限法的替代方法。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2017 Dec;26(6):2487-2504. doi: 10.1177/0962280215601133. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Issues and pitfalls in method comparison studies.方法比较研究中的问题与陷阱。
Vet Anaesth Analg. 2014 May;41(3):227-32. doi: 10.1111/vaa.12143. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
9
Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.一致性相关系数与个体一致性系数在评估一致性方面的比较。
J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(4):721-38. doi: 10.1080/10543400701329497.
10
Evidence-based practice: noninvasive blood pressure measurement in children.
Pediatr Nurs. 2006 May-Jun;32(3):263-7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Cardio-Pad project: progress and remaining challenges.心脏垫项目:进展与尚存挑战
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017 Feb;7(1):98-101. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2016.11.01.
2
Objective Versus Self-Reported Physical Activity in Overweight and Obese Young Adults.超重和肥胖青年成年人的客观与自我报告身体活动情况
J Phys Act Health. 2015 Oct;12(10):1394-400. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2014-0277. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
3
Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies.方法比较研究的设计、分析与解读
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;19(2):223-34. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3.
4
Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine.评估与运动医学相关变量测量误差(可靠性)的统计方法。
Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):217-38. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002.