• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学研究中的定性访谈

Qualitative interviews in medical research.

作者信息

Britten N

机构信息

Department of General Practice, United Medical School, Guy's Hospitals, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251
PMID:7627048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550292/
Abstract

Much qualitative research is interview based, and this paper provides an outline of qualitative interview techniques and their application in medical settings. It explains the rationale for these techniques and shows how they can be used to research kinds of questions that are different from those dealt with by quantitative methods. Different types of qualitative interviews are described, and the way in which they differ from clinical consultations is emphasised. Practical guidance for conducting such interviews is given.

摘要

许多定性研究是以访谈为基础的,本文概述了定性访谈技巧及其在医学环境中的应用。它解释了这些技巧的基本原理,并展示了如何利用它们来研究与定量方法所处理的问题不同类型的问题。文中描述了不同类型的定性访谈,并强调了它们与临床会诊的不同之处。还给出了进行此类访谈的实用指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa80/2550292/3f4068b56cc8/bmj00602-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa80/2550292/3f4068b56cc8/bmj00602-0050-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa80/2550292/3f4068b56cc8/bmj00602-0050-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Qualitative interviews in medical research.医学研究中的定性访谈
BMJ. 1995 Jul 22;311(6999):251-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6999.251.
2
Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.焦点小组访谈:姑息治疗研究人员和临床医生指南
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003 May;9(5):202-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.5.11490.
3
Engaging men with penile cancer in qualitative research: reflections from an interview-based study.让阴茎癌男性参与定性研究:基于访谈研究的思考
Nurse Res. 2014 Jan;21(3):13-9. doi: 10.7748/nr2014.01.21.3.13.e1218.
4
'Questerviews': using questionnaires in qualitative interviews as a method of integrating qualitative and quantitative health services research.“问卷调查访谈”:在定性访谈中使用问卷作为整合定性和定量卫生服务研究的一种方法。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2004 Jul;9(3):139-45. doi: 10.1258/1355819041403268.
5
The qualitative research interview.定性研究访谈
Med Educ. 2006 Apr;40(4):314-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x.
6
Research interviews in midwifery.
RCM Midwives. 2003 Jun;6(6):260-3.
7
[Quality control and assessment of qualitative interview in health care research].[医疗保健研究中定性访谈的质量控制与评估]
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008 Jul;6(7):668-73. doi: 10.3736/jcim20080702.
8
The use of ethnographic interviewing to inform questionnaire construction.
Health Educ Q. 1992 Spring;19(1):9-23. doi: 10.1177/109019819201900102.
9
Narrative interviewing.叙事访谈
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):631-4. doi: 10.1007/s11096-015-0222-0.
10
Laddered questions and qualitative data research interviews.阶梯式问题与定性数据研究访谈。
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Feb;37(3):273-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02086.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A narrative approach for the management of low back pain in general practice: An in-depth patient interviews study.全科医疗中腰痛管理的叙事方法:一项深入患者访谈研究
Eur J Gen Pract. 2025 Dec;31(1):2522183. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2025.2522183. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Experiences of stigma and access to care among long COVID patients: a qualitative study in a multi-ethnic population in the Netherlands.长期新冠患者的耻辱感经历及获得医疗服务的情况:荷兰多民族人群的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):e094487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094487.
3
Artificial intelligence for contextual well-being: Protocol for an exploratory sequential mixed methods study with medical students as a social microcosm.

本文引用的文献

1
Sudden infant death syndrome: links with infant care practices.
BMJ. 1993 Jan 2;306(6869):16-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6869.16.
2
The views of singlehanded general practitioners: a qualitative study.个体执业全科医生的观点:一项定性研究。
BMJ. 1993 Sep 4;307(6904):607-10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6904.607.
3
Rigour and qualitative research.严谨性与定性研究。
BMJ. 1995 Jul 8;311(6997):109-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6997.109.
用于情境幸福感的人工智能:以医学生作为社会缩影的探索性序列混合方法研究方案。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0321426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321426. eCollection 2025.
4
Psychosocial Challenges and Coping Strategies Among Adults Living with HIV in Ubungo Municipality, Tanzania: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.坦桑尼亚乌本戈市成年艾滋病毒感染者的心理社会挑战与应对策略:一项定性描述性研究
East Afr Health Res J. 2024;8(3):417-425. doi: 10.24248/eahrj.v8i3.812. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
5
"An eye-opener:" a qualitative study of a liberal arts approach to medical education.“大开眼界”:对医学教育文科方法的定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07157-z.
6
What Are the Experiences, Views and Perceptions of Patients, Carers and Clinicians of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists (GLP-1 RAs)? A Scoping Review.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)的患者、护理人员和临床医生的体验、观点及认知是怎样的?一项范围综述。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70251. doi: 10.1111/hex.70251.
7
Online search and activities of parents of children with ADHD: a qualitative study.多动症患儿家长的在线搜索行为及活动:一项定性研究
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2025 Mar 24;19(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13034-025-00886-5.
8
Patients' experiences with GLP1-RAs - a systematic review.患者使用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂的体验——一项系统评价
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Jun;43(2):370-379. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2477141. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
9
Pathways to a diagnosis of trigeminal neuralgia: a qualitative study of patients' experiences.三叉神经痛的诊断途径:对患者经历的定性研究
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Mar 6;26(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02763-8.
10
Exploring data security risks associated with trauma medical data within hospitals in China: a qualitative study.探索中国医院创伤医学数据相关的数据安全风险:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 22;15(2):e085221. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085221.
4
Uncomfortable prescribing decisions: a critical incident study.令人不适的处方决策:一项关键事件研究
BMJ. 1992 Feb 1;304(6822):294-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6822.294.