Siegel V
Cell. 1995 Jul 28;82(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90301-1.
As summarized in this minireview, two different signal recognition events, one involving SRP and the other involving proteoliposomes containing the Sec61p complex, have been identified. In cotranslational protein transport, it seems that both recognition events are required for efficient translocation of the protein into the lumen of the ER. The requirement for SRP can, under certain experimental conditions, be circumvented by depletion of NAC, a heterodimeric complex that can block the tight association of nascent chain-ribosome complexes to the Sec61p complex in the ER membrane. In posttranslational protein transport, the Sec61p complex contains additional protein subunits that are required for function. It should be noted that, in all the experiments performed in which the role of SRP in cotranslational protein translocation is circumvented (Jungnickel and Rapoport, 1995; Lauring et al., 1995a, 1995b), stable translocation intermediates are allowed many minutes to establish productive interactions with the membrane. In contrast, during conditions in which the nascent chain can elongate (e.g., in vivo), the nascent chain-ribosome complex only has a brief time window during which it can initiate translocation (reviewed by Walter and Johnson, 1994). It is possible that, under these conditions, productive translocation even in the absence of NAC would require SRP. The isolation of NAC-deficient extracts that support protein synthesis will allow a test of this possibility. Finally, the role that lipids themselves may play in protein transport should not be ignored. Gierasch and coworkers (Hoyt and Gierasch, 1991, and references therein) have shown that bacterial signal peptides have an intrinsic ability to interact with lipid and that the relative ability of a mutant signal sequence to interact with lipid correlates with its function as a signal sequence in vivo. Thus, the signal sequence-discriminatory role defined by Jungnickel and Rapoport (1995) may in fact be played by lipid, with the Sec61p complex playing a necessary but nondiscriminatory role in the process. In this light, it is interesting that Martoglio et al. (1995) recently demonstrated that the signal sequence of preprolactin could be cross-linked to phospholipid. Analysis of the cross-linking efficiency of the signal sequence to phospholipid at different nascent chain lengths and with mutant signal sequences will help define the role that phospholipid plays in the process.
如本综述所总结,已经鉴定出两种不同的信号识别事件,一种涉及信号识别颗粒(SRP),另一种涉及含有Sec61p复合物的蛋白脂质体。在共翻译蛋白质转运过程中,似乎这两种识别事件对于蛋白质高效转运到内质网腔都是必需的。在某些实验条件下,通过耗尽NAC(一种异二聚体复合物,可阻断新生链 - 核糖体复合物与内质网膜中Sec61p复合物的紧密结合),可以规避对SRP的需求。在翻译后蛋白质转运过程中,Sec61p复合物包含功能所需的额外蛋白质亚基。应当指出的是,在所有规避SRP在共翻译蛋白质转运中作用的实验中(Jungnickel和Rapoport,1995;Lauring等人,1995a,1995b),稳定的转运中间体被允许有许多分钟的时间来与膜建立有效的相互作用。相比之下,在新生链可以延长的条件下(例如在体内),新生链 - 核糖体复合物只有一个短暂的时间窗口来启动转运(Walter和Johnson,1994综述)。在这些条件下,即使没有NAC,有效的转运也可能需要SRP。分离支持蛋白质合成的NAC缺陷提取物将有助于检验这种可能性。最后,脂质本身在蛋白质转运中可能发挥的作用不应被忽视。Gierasch及其同事(Hoyt和Gierasch,1991以及其中的参考文献)已经表明,细菌信号肽具有与脂质相互作用的内在能力,并且突变信号序列与脂质相互作用的相对能力与其在体内作为信号序列的功能相关。因此,Jungnickel和Rapoport(1995)定义的信号序列区分作用实际上可能由脂质发挥,而Sec61p复合物在此过程中发挥必要但非区分性的作用。有鉴于此,Martoglio等人(1995)最近证明催乳素原的信号序列可以与磷脂交联,这一点很有趣。分析不同新生链长度和突变信号序列下信号序列与磷脂的交联效率将有助于确定磷脂在此过程中所起的作用。