Butscher K, Mazoit J X, Samii K
Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Université Paris-Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre France.
Can J Anaesth. 1995 Jun;42(6):461-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03011681.
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of two dosage regimens of (i.m.) morphine calculated from an initial (i.v.) titrated dose in the early postoperative period. Seventy ASA I-III patients who underwent general anaesthesia (GA) (n = 58), regional anaesthesia (RA) (n = 10) or GA+RA (n = 2) for orthopaedic (n = 54), urological (n = 11) or abdominal surgery (n = 5) received i.v. titrated morphine in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU). Titration consisted of 3 mg morphine i.v. every ten minutes until patients had a visual analogue pain scale (VAS) < 3, without marked sedation. Seventeen patients did not complain at all or had good analgesia with an initial i.v. dose < or = 6 mg of morphine followed by paracetamol only. Patients who needed more than 6 mg i.v.morphine were randomly assigned to a "high-dose" or a "low-dose" group and received a systematic i.m. morphine regimen calculated from the initial titrated dose. Pain was assessed by VAS before each i.m. injection and the next morning. One patient had respiratory depression and one marked sedation in the PACU. These patients were excluded from the rest of the study. Only 16 patients were excluded from the rest of the study. Only 16 patients had a VAS > 3 at least once during the study period and only three needed rescue analgesia which was available on request. We conclude that a systematic i.m. morphine regimen adapted from an initial i.v. titration in the PACU provides efficacious and relatively inexpensive postoperative analgesia, applicable to a great majority of patients.
这项前瞻性研究的目的是评估在术后早期根据初始静脉滴定剂量计算的两种肌肉注射吗啡给药方案的疗效。70例接受全身麻醉(GA)(n = 58)、区域麻醉(RA)(n = 10)或GA+RA(n = 2)的ASA I-III级患者,因骨科手术(n = 54)、泌尿外科手术(n = 11)或腹部手术(n = 5),在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)接受静脉滴定吗啡。滴定方法为每十分钟静脉注射3毫克吗啡,直至患者视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAS)< 3,且无明显镇静作用。17例患者最初静脉注射吗啡剂量≤6毫克,之后仅服用对乙酰氨基酚,他们根本没有抱怨或镇痛效果良好。需要超过6毫克静脉注射吗啡的患者被随机分为“高剂量”或“低剂量”组,并接受根据初始滴定剂量计算的系统性肌肉注射吗啡方案。在每次肌肉注射前及次日早晨通过VAS评估疼痛。1例患者在PACU出现呼吸抑制,1例出现明显镇静。这些患者被排除在研究的其余部分之外。只有16例患者被排除在研究的其余部分之外。在研究期间,只有16例患者至少有一次VAS> 3,只有3例需要按需提供的解救镇痛。我们得出结论,在PACU中根据初始静脉滴定调整的系统性肌肉注射吗啡方案可提供有效且相对廉价的术后镇痛,适用于绝大多数患者。