Rutter P C, Murphy F, Dudley H A
Br Med J. 1980 Jan 5;280(6206):12-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.280.6206.12.
Forty-five patients who had undergone major operations were given a slow intravenous injection of morphine sulphate (1 mg/ml saline) until their pain was relieved and were then randomly divided into three equal groups to receive different regimens of morphine sulphate over the next 72 hours. Patients in group A received 3.5 times the pain-relieving dose (28-63 mg, mean 36 mg) by continuous intravenous infusion; those in group B received the pain-relieving dose (90-160 mg, mean 110 mg) intramuscularly, four-hourly for the first 24 hours, six-hourly for the next 24 hours, and then eight and 20 hours later; and those in group C received the pain-relieving dose (80-280 mg, mean 140 mg) intramuscularly as required. Pain was assessed on a linear analogue scale and vital capacity and peak expiratory flow rate measured 12-hourly. The mean pain score was significantly lower and respiratory function significantly better in group A than in groups B and C. Only one patient (in group A) required extra morphine. Thus morphine administered by continuous intravenous infusion is superior to other regimens, giving better pain relief at a lower dosage.
45例接受大手术的患者缓慢静脉注射硫酸吗啡(1mg/ml生理盐水)直至疼痛缓解,然后随机分为三组,在接下来的72小时接受不同的硫酸吗啡给药方案。A组患者通过持续静脉输注接受止痛剂量3.5倍(28 - 63mg,平均36mg)的药物;B组患者在前24小时每4小时、接下来24小时每6小时,然后在8小时和20小时后肌肉注射止痛剂量(90 - 160mg,平均110mg);C组患者根据需要肌肉注射止痛剂量(80 - 280mg,平均140mg)。采用线性模拟评分法评估疼痛,并每12小时测量一次肺活量和呼气峰值流速。A组的平均疼痛评分显著低于B组和C组,呼吸功能显著优于B组和C组。仅1例患者(A组)需要额外使用吗啡。因此,持续静脉输注吗啡优于其他给药方案,能以更低剂量提供更好的疼痛缓解效果。