Sonnenberg S M
Int J Psychoanal. 1995 Apr;76 ( Pt 2):335-42.
In recent decades analysts in North America have been writing about the challenge of listening to clinical material in ways which take account of the two person psychoanalytic situation. In that mutually regressive setting, self-analytic thinking on behalf of the analysand is essential for many analysts, because in it the analyst often relies on thoughts and feelings about conflicted and painful personal experience better to understand the analysand's inner experience. Effortful introspection allows some mastery, at least for the moment, of conflict which might otherwise prevent the analyst from thinking about and understanding what his inner experience may be telling him about his patient's mental life. In this essay the author describes the way an humiliating memory from his own childhood, recalled in response to his patient's dream, served as a cornerstone of his self-analytic effort on behalf of his patient. Coupled with self-analysis concerning his recent neck surgery, the analyst's self-reflections allowed him to be sensitive to a critical development in the analysis. This way of working complements the more traditional way analysts develop ideas from direct observation of the analysand in the consulting room.
近几十年来,北美地区的分析师们一直在探讨如何以考虑到两人精神分析情境的方式倾听临床素材所带来的挑战。在那种相互退行的情境中,对许多分析师而言,代表受分析者进行自我分析性思考至关重要,因为在这种情境下,分析师常常依靠对冲突且痛苦的个人经历的想法和感受,以便更好地理解受分析者的内心体验。刻意的内省能让人至少在当下掌控可能会妨碍分析师思考并理解其内心体验可能向他传达的有关其患者精神生活信息的冲突。在本文中,作者描述了他童年时期一段屈辱的记忆是如何因回应患者的梦而被唤起,并成为他代表患者进行自我分析努力的基石。再加上他对近期颈部手术的自我分析,这位分析师的自我反思使他能够敏锐地察觉到分析过程中的一个关键进展。这种工作方式补充了分析师们在咨询室通过直接观察受分析者来形成观点的更传统方式。