Suppr超能文献

副临床检查在多发性硬化症中的诊断价值:根据波泽委员会标准进行重新分类的相对敏感性和特异性

Diagnostic value of paraclinical tests in multiple sclerosis: relative sensitivities and specificities for reclassification according to the Poser committee criteria.

作者信息

Beer S, Rösler K M, Hess C W

机构信息

Department of Neurology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;59(2):152-9. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.59.2.152.

Abstract

The yield of paraclinical tests was evaluated in a prospective study of 189 consecutive patients referred for suspected multiple sclerosis (142 patients with multiple sclerosis, 47 non-multiple sclerosis patients on discharge). Patients were first classified according to the Poser criteria by the clinical findings. Subsequently, the results of paraclinical tests (cranial MRI, visually evoked potentials (VEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials by tibial nerve stimulation (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and analysis of CSF for oligoclonal banding and IgG-index (CSF)) were taken into account. The percentage of reclassified patients (reclassification sensitivity, RS) was always lower than the percentage of abnormal results (diagnostic sensitivity, DS), and the divergence of RS v DS differed between the tests (60% v 84% in MRI, 31% v 77% in CSF, 29% v 37% in VEPs, 20% v 68% in MEPs, and 12% v 46% in SSEPs respectively). False reclassifications of non-multiple sclerosis patients to multiple sclerosis would have occurred with all tests (MRI: six of 47 patients, (reclassification specificity 88%); CSF: one (98%); VEPs: two (96%); MEPs: two (96%); SSEPs: four (91%); P < 0.05). Although MRI had superior diagnostic capacity, 57 of the 142 patients with multiple sclerosis were not reclassified by the MRI result, 12 of whom were reclassified by CSF and 18 by one of the evoked potential (EP) studies. Of the 98 patients not reclassified by CSF, 53 were reclassified by MRI and 39 by EPs. The results suggest that for the evaluation of paraclinical tests in suspected multiple sclerosis, comparison of diagnostic sensitivities is inappropriate. In general, a cranial MRI contributes most to the diagnosis; however, due to its comparatively low specificity and its considerable number of negative results, EP or CSF studies are often useful to establish the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

摘要

在一项对189例因疑似多发性硬化症转诊的连续患者进行的前瞻性研究中,评估了临床旁检查的结果(142例多发性硬化症患者,47例出院时诊断为非多发性硬化症的患者)。首先根据临床发现按照波塞尔标准对患者进行分类。随后,考虑临床旁检查的结果(头颅磁共振成像(MRI)、视觉诱发电位(VEP)、胫神经刺激体感诱发电位(SSEP)、运动诱发电位(MEP)以及脑脊液寡克隆带和IgG指数分析(CSF))。重新分类患者的百分比(重新分类敏感性,RS)始终低于异常结果的百分比(诊断敏感性,DS),并且RS与DS之间的差异在不同检查中有所不同(MRI分别为60%对84%,CSF为31%对77%,VEP为29%对37%,MEP为20%对68%,SSEP为12%对46%)。所有检查均会出现将非多发性硬化症患者误重新分类为多发性硬化症的情况(MRI:47例患者中有6例,(重新分类特异性88%);CSF:1例(98%);VEP:2例(96%);MEP:2例(96%);SSEP:4例(91%);P<0.05)。虽然MRI具有更高的诊断能力,但142例多发性硬化症患者中有57例未根据MRI结果重新分类,其中12例通过CSF重新分类,18例通过一项诱发电位(EP)研究重新分类。在98例未通过CSF重新分类的患者中,53例通过MRI重新分类,39例通过EP重新分类。结果表明,对于疑似多发性硬化症患者的临床旁检查评估,比较诊断敏感性是不合适的。一般来说,头颅MRI对诊断贡献最大;然而,由于其相对较低的特异性和相当数量的阴性结果,EP或CSF研究对于确立多发性硬化症的诊断通常很有用。

相似文献

2
Comparative impact of paraclinical studies in establishing the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Nov;73(5):433-42. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(89)90093-x.
10
Multiple sclerosis in children: clinical, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological correlations.
Zhonghua Min Guo Xiao Er Ke Yi Xue Hui Za Zhi. 1995 Mar-Apr;36(2):93-100.

引用本文的文献

2
Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2023 Jun;150:131-175. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2023.03.010. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
3
Low Contrast Visual Evoked Potentials for Early Detection of Optic Neuritis.
Front Neurol. 2022 Apr 29;13:804395. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.804395. eCollection 2022.
4
The electrophysiological assessment of visual function in Multiple Sclerosis.
Clin Neurophysiol Pract. 2019 May 8;4:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2019.03.002. eCollection 2019.
5
A new role for evoked potentials in MS? Repurposing evoked potentials as biomarkers for clinical trials in MS.
Mult Scler. 2017 Sep;23(10):1309-1319. doi: 10.1177/1352458517707265. Epub 2017 May 8.
7
Multiple measures of corticospinal excitability are associated with clinical features of multiple sclerosis.
Behav Brain Res. 2016 Jan 15;297:187-95. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.015. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
8
Clinical correlations of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in neuromyelitis optica.
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 25;9(11):e113631. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113631. eCollection 2014.
9
Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.
Doc Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;130(1):25-30. doi: 10.1007/s10633-014-9466-6. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

3
Assessment of MRI criteria for a diagnosis of MS.
Neurology. 1993 May;43(5):905-9. doi: 10.1212/wnl.43.5.905.
7
Evoked potential changes in clinically definite multiple sclerosis: a two year follow up study.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1982 Jun;45(6):494-500. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.45.6.494.
9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验