McFarlane W R, Lukens E, Link B, Dushay R, Deakins S A, Newmark M, Dunne E J, Horen B, Toran J
Department of Epidemiology of Mental Disorders, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, USA.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1995 Aug;52(8):679-87. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200069016.
To compare outcomes in psychoeducational multiple-family group treatment vs psychoeducational single-family treatment.
A total of 172 acutely psychotic patients, aged 18 to 45 years, with DSM-III-R schizophrenic disorders were randomly assigned to single- or multiple-family psychoeducational treatment at six public hospitals in the state of New York. Psychotic relapse, symptom status, medication compliance, rehospitalization, and employment were assessed independently during 2 years of supervised treatment.
The multiple-family groups yielded significantly lower 2-year cumulative relapse rates than did the single-family modality (16% vs 27%) and achieved markedly lower rates in patients whose conditions had not remitted at index hospital discharge (13% vs 33%). The relapse hazard ratio between treatments was 1:3. The relapse rate for both modalities was less than half the expected rate (65% to 80% for 2 years) for patients receiving individual treatment and medication. Rehospitalization rates and psychotic symptoms decreased significantly, and medication compliance was high, to an equal degree in both modalities.
Psychoeducational multiple-family groups were more effective than single-family treatment in extending remission, especially in patients at higher risk for relapse, with a cost-benefit ratio of up to 1:34.
比较心理教育多家庭团体治疗与心理教育单家庭治疗的效果。
172名年龄在18至45岁之间、患有DSM-III-R精神分裂症的急性精神病患者被随机分配到纽约州六家公立医院接受单家庭或多家庭心理教育治疗。在为期2年的监督治疗期间,对精神病复发、症状状态、药物依从性、再次住院和就业情况进行独立评估。
多家庭团体治疗的2年累积复发率显著低于单家庭治疗(16%对27%),且在出院时病情未缓解的患者中复发率明显更低(13%对33%)。两种治疗方法之间的复发风险比为1:3。两种治疗方式的复发率均不到接受个体治疗和药物治疗患者预期复发率(两年65%至80%)的一半。再次住院率和精神病症状显著下降,两种治疗方式的药物依从性均较高且程度相同。
心理教育多家庭团体治疗在延长缓解期方面比单家庭治疗更有效,尤其是在复发风险较高的患者中,成本效益比高达1:34。