• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定儿童健康的优先事项:家庭医生和儿科医生的观点。

Setting priorities for children's health: viewpoints of family physicians and pediatricians.

作者信息

Schneider D

机构信息

Department of Urban Studies and Community Health, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08903.

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(5):387-94.

PMID:7632204
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this study family physicians and pediatricians were asked to rank public health goals for children for the year 2000 and to assign responsibility for implementing these goals.

METHODS

All members of the New Jersey chapters of the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American Academy of Family Physicians were sent a one-time mail questionnaire. Statistical analysis of responses, a review of written comments, and follow-up telephone interviews completed the study.

RESULTS

About 500 physicians returned the surveys (25 percent response rate). The highest ranked public health goals were reducing tobacco, alcohol, and other drug abuse; improving physical activity and fitness; immunizing against and controlling infectious diseases; and improving maternal and infant health. Physicians assigned prevention efforts to the federal government, the family, and the individual.

CONCLUSIONS

Family physicians and pediatricians routinely interact with two of the parties to whom they assign prevention responsibility--the individual and the family. The ability of physicians to influence these parties will increase if universal access to primary care and preventive services becomes law. This means they will also be in a unique position to influence high-priority public health goals for children.

摘要

背景

在本研究中,家庭医生和儿科医生被要求对2000年儿童公共卫生目标进行排序,并确定实现这些目标的责任主体。

方法

向美国儿科学会新泽西分会和美国家庭医生学会的所有成员发送了一次性邮寄问卷。对回复进行统计分析、审查书面评论并进行后续电话访谈,从而完成了本研究。

结果

约500名医生回复了调查问卷(回复率为25%)。排名最高的公共卫生目标是减少烟草、酒精和其他药物滥用;增加体育活动和提高身体素质;预防和控制传染病;以及改善母婴健康。医生们将预防工作的责任分配给联邦政府、家庭和个人。

结论

家庭医生和儿科医生日常与他们所确定的预防责任主体中的两方——个人和家庭进行互动。如果普及初级保健和预防服务成为法律,医生影响这些主体的能力将会增强。这意味着他们在影响儿童高度优先的公共卫生目标方面也将处于独特的地位。

相似文献

1
Setting priorities for children's health: viewpoints of family physicians and pediatricians.确定儿童健康的优先事项:家庭医生和儿科医生的观点。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1994 Sep-Oct;7(5):387-94.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
4
Do pediatricians think they are responsible for identification and management of child mental health problems? Results of the AAP periodic survey.儿科医生认为他们应对儿童心理健康问题的识别和管理负责吗?美国儿科学会定期调查结果。
Ambul Pediatr. 2008 Jan-Feb;8(1):11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ambp.2007.10.006.
5
Children's first dental visit: attitudes and practices of US pediatricans and family physicians.儿童首次看牙:美国儿科医生和家庭医生的态度与做法
Pediatr Dent. 2003 Sep-Oct;25(5):425-30.
6
Universal hepatitis B immunization of infants: reactions of pediatricians and family physicians over time.婴儿普遍接种乙型肝炎疫苗:儿科医生和家庭医生随时间的反应
Pediatrics. 1994 May;93(5):747-51.
7
How do physicians immunize their own children? Differences among pediatricians and nonpediatricians.医生如何为自己的孩子接种疫苗?儿科医生与非儿科医生之间的差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e623-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0885.
8
The use of recommended communication techniques by Maryland family physicians and pediatricians.马里兰州家庭医生和儿科医生对推荐沟通技巧的使用情况。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 9;10(4):e0119855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119855. eCollection 2015.
9
Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice.“婴儿多伊”事件重演?美国卫生与公众服务部及2002年《出生时存活婴儿保护法》:关于规范新生儿医疗行为的警示
Pediatrics. 2005 Oct;116(4):e576-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1590.
10
Immunization practices of pediatricians and family physicians in the United States.美国儿科医生和家庭医生的免疫接种实践。
Pediatrics. 1994 Oct;94(4 Pt 1):517-23.