Klumb P L
Department of Psychology, Berlin University of Technology, Germany.
Ergonomics. 1995 Jul;38(7):1456-67. doi: 10.1080/00140139508925202.
A German version of Broadbent's Cognitive Failures Questionnaire was developed because there was no comparable German instrument. As external validity criteria observable failures in everyday situations were used. The positive correlations were significant but moderate in size. For construct validation, inventories of trait anxiety, coping styles and action control were used. Most of the correlations were significant and in the expected direction. A maximum likelihood factor analysis of the questionnaire suggested that the utility of the total score may be doubtful. The unidimensionality of the construct requires further investigation.
由于没有可比的德语工具,因此开发了德语版的布罗德本特认知失误问卷。以日常情况下可观察到的失误作为外部效度标准。正相关显著,但规模适中。为了进行结构效度验证,使用了特质焦虑、应对方式和行动控制量表。大多数相关性显著且符合预期方向。对该问卷的最大似然因子分析表明,总分的效用可能存疑。该结构的单维性需要进一步研究。