Katzman M, Sudol M
Department of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033, USA.
J Virol. 1995 Sep;69(9):5687-96. doi: 10.1128/JVI.69.9.5687-5696.1995.
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and visna virus integrases were purified from a bacterial expression system and assayed on oligonucleotide substrates derived from each terminus of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and visna virus linear DNA. Three differences between the proteins were identified, including levels of specific 3'-end processing, patterns of strand transfer, and target site preferences. To map domains of integrase (IN) responsible for viral DNA specificity and target site selection, we constructed and purified chimeric proteins in which the N-terminal, central, and C-terminal regions of these lentiviral integrases were exchanged. All six chimeric proteins were active for disintegration, demonstrating that the active site in the central region of each chimera maintained a functional conformation. Analysis of endonucleolytic processing activity indicated that the N terminus of IN does not contribute to viral DNA specificity; this function must reside in the central region or C terminus of IN. In the viral DNA integration assay, chimeric proteins gave novel patterns of strand transfer products which did not match that of either wild-type IN. Thus, target site selection with a viral DNA terminus as nucleophile could not be mapped to regions of IN defined by these boundaries and may involve interactions between regions. In contrast, when target site preferences were monitored with a new assay in which glycerol stimulates IN-mediated cleavage of nonviral DNA, chimeras clearly segregated between the two wild-type patterns. Target site selection for this nonspecific alcoholysis activity mapped to the central region of IN. This report represents the first detailed description of functional chimeras between any two retroviral integrases.
1型人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV-1)和维斯纳病毒整合酶从细菌表达系统中纯化出来,并在源自1型人类免疫缺陷病毒和维斯纳病毒线性DNA每个末端的寡核苷酸底物上进行检测。鉴定出这两种蛋白质之间的三个差异,包括特异性3'-末端加工水平、链转移模式和靶位点偏好。为了绘制负责病毒DNA特异性和靶位点选择的整合酶(IN)结构域,我们构建并纯化了嵌合蛋白,其中这些慢病毒整合酶的N末端、中央区域和C末端区域进行了交换。所有六种嵌合蛋白都具有解体活性,表明每个嵌合体中央区域的活性位点保持了功能构象。对核酸内切加工活性的分析表明,IN的N末端对病毒DNA特异性没有贡献;该功能一定存在于IN的中央区域或C末端。在病毒DNA整合试验中,嵌合蛋白产生了与野生型IN均不匹配的新型链转移产物模式。因此,以病毒DNA末端作为亲核试剂的靶位点选择不能映射到由这些边界定义的IN区域,可能涉及区域之间的相互作用。相比之下,当用一种新的试验监测靶位点偏好时,其中甘油刺激IN介导的非病毒DNA切割,嵌合体在两种野生型模式之间明显分离。这种非特异性醇解活性的靶位点选择映射到IN的中央区域。本报告首次详细描述了任何两种逆转录病毒整合酶之间的功能性嵌合体。