Katzman M, Sudol M
Department of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033-0850, USA.
J Virol. 1996 Dec;70(12):9069-73. doi: 10.1128/JVI.70.12.9069-9073.1996.
A comparison of the extents of site-specific cleavage of U5 and U3 viral DNA termini by the integrases of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and visna virus guided the quantitative testing of oligonucleotide substrates containing specific base substitutions. The simultaneous exchange of positions 5 and 6 between U3 substrates switched the patterns of differential susceptibility to the two integrases. The activity of visna virus integrase was more dependent on the identity of position 5 adjacent to the invariant CA bases than on position 6, whereas human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase appeared to interact even more critically with position 6. Although the paired natural substrates of most lentiviral integrases match at positions 7 and 8, these bases were not important for susceptibility of U5 substrates. In fact, the final six U5 positions contained all of the sequence information necessary for susceptibility. These results suggest that constraints other than integration influence the terminal inverted repeats of retroviral DNA.
对人类免疫缺陷病毒1型和维斯纳病毒整合酶对U5和U3病毒DNA末端位点特异性切割程度的比较,指导了对含有特定碱基取代的寡核苷酸底物的定量测试。U3底物之间5号和6号位置的同时交换改变了对两种整合酶的差异敏感性模式。维斯纳病毒整合酶的活性对与不变的CA碱基相邻的5号位置的同一性比对6号位置更依赖,而人类免疫缺陷病毒1型整合酶似乎与6号位置的相互作用更为关键。尽管大多数慢病毒整合酶的配对天然底物在7号和8号位置匹配,但这些碱基对U5底物的敏感性并不重要。事实上,U5的最后六个位置包含了敏感性所需的所有序列信息。这些结果表明,除整合作用外的其他限制因素影响逆转录病毒DNA的末端反向重复序列。