Suppr超能文献

[手术和永久性腔内刺激在肥厚型心肌病治疗中的当前各自作用]

[Current respective role of surgery and permanent endocavitary stimulation in the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathies].

作者信息

Millaire A, de Groote P, Decoulx E, Ducloux G

机构信息

Service de Cardiologie, Hôpital Cardiologique, CHRU, Lille.

出版信息

Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1995 May;44(5):226-33.

PMID:7639504
Abstract

Surgery and cardiac pacing are the two main non-drug treatments for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Various surgical techniques have been proposed over the last 35 years: myotomy, myotomy-septal myomectomy, isolated mitral valve replacement, heart transplantation. Patients eligible for surgery are those with severe symptoms (NYHA stage III or IV) and refractory or no longer responding to drug treatment. The choice between the various techniques is based on morphological and haemodynamic criteria (significant subaortic gradient associated with increased septal thickness, severe and/or organic mitral regurgitation, either isolated or associated with obstruction, or less severe or heterogeneous septal thickness [< 18 mm]) or therapeutic criteria (failure of primary myomectomy, depletion of all surgical possibilities). Analysis of the results of surgery is complicated by the variety of techniques performed and the experience of the various teams. The operative mortality was markedly decreased (between 2 and 11% at the present time); the complications of myomectomy (ventricular septal defect, disturbances of conduction requiring continuous pacing) are still frequent. Intraoperative transoesophageal ultrasonography could help to further decrease the operative risk. Surgery improves functional symptoms and exercise tolerance. This beneficial effect appears to be more marked, more frequent and more lasting than that of medical treatment. Surgical treatment does not ensure permanent cure, as the symptoms related to pathophysiological abnormalities other than intraventricular obstruction (abnormalities of diastolic filling, myocardial ischaemia, arrhythmias) may develop subsequently. No controlled trial has demonstrated a favourable effect on survival. Continuous pacing, introduced more recently, can now be considered to be a therapeutic method in its own right.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

手术和心脏起搏是肥厚型心肌病的两种主要非药物治疗方法。在过去35年里,人们提出了各种手术技术:肌切开术、肌切开术 - 室间隔心肌切除术、单纯二尖瓣置换术、心脏移植术。适合手术的患者是那些有严重症状(纽约心脏协会心功能分级III或IV级)且对药物治疗难治或不再有反应的患者。各种技术之间的选择基于形态学和血流动力学标准(与室间隔厚度增加相关的明显主动脉下梯度、严重和/或器质性二尖瓣反流,无论是孤立的还是与梗阻相关的,或者室间隔厚度较轻或不均匀[<18毫米])或治疗标准(初次心肌切除术失败、所有手术可能性用尽)。由于所实施技术的多样性和各团队的经验,手术结果的分析很复杂。手术死亡率已显著降低(目前在2%至11%之间);心肌切除术的并发症(室间隔缺损、需要持续起搏的传导障碍)仍然很常见。术中经食管超声心动图有助于进一步降低手术风险。手术可改善功能症状和运动耐量。这种有益效果似乎比药物治疗更显著、更频繁且更持久。手术治疗不能确保永久治愈,因为除了心室内梗阻之外的与病理生理异常相关的症状(舒张期充盈异常、心肌缺血、心律失常)可能随后出现。尚无对照试验证明其对生存率有有利影响。最近引入的持续起搏现在可被视为一种独立的治疗方法。(摘要截取自250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验