Suppr超能文献

利什曼病的血清学诊断

Serodiagnosis of leishmaniasis.

作者信息

Kar K

机构信息

Leishmania Group, Indian Institute of Chemical Biology, Calcutta.

出版信息

Crit Rev Microbiol. 1995;21(2):123-52. doi: 10.3109/10408419509113537.

Abstract

Leishmaniasis is a spectrum of diseases ranging in severity from cutaneous (CL), post-kala-azar dermal (PKDL), and diffuse cutaneous (DCL) to mucocutaneous (MCL) and visceral (VL) infections that are endemic in 86 tropical and subtropical countries around the world, accounting for 75,000 deaths per year. Different forms of leishmaniases are generally caused by different distinct species of Leishmania having a digenetic life cycle alternating between an aflagellated amastigote form replicative within the macrophages of the host and a flagellated promastigote form that multiplies within the gut of the sandfly. VL, MCL, PKDL, DCL, and CL forms of the disease can be arranged on a priority basis in accordance with the humoral immune responses of host. Generally, the cell-mediated immunity, particularly the delayed-type hypersensitivity to leishmanial antigens, is associated with CL, MCL, PKDL, and cured VL cases. The serodiagnosis of leishmaniasis appears to be an alternative to parasite detection in biopsy samples either by the staining of amastigotes or by culturing the amastigotes, which transform to a promastigote form and replicate. A battery of immunological procedures have been developed or adapted to demonstrate either humoral or cell-mediated immune responses against Leishmania for diagnosis and epidemiological survey. The sensitivity and specificity of such diagnostic methods depend on the type, source, and purity of antigen employed, as some of the leishmanial antigens have common cross-reactive epitopes shared with other microorganisms, particularly Trypanosoma, Mycobacteria, Plasmodia, and Schistosoma. Serodiagnostic techniques for the detection of antileishmanial antibodies have been employed with about 72 to 100, 23 to 90, 83, and 33 to 100% success in VL, CL, MCL, and PKDL patients, respectively. The Leishmanin skin test (LST) is useful to detect MCL and CL, with about 100 and 84% success, respectively. In PKDL, the gradual fall of antileishmanial antibody titer to some extent and the rise of delayed hypersensitivity to the parasite antigen are the characteristic features associated with the chronicity of the disease. The use of whole promastigote as the source of antigens in the direct agglutination test (DAT) and immunofluorescent test (IFAT) gave cross-reactions with the sera of leprosy, tuberculosis, and African trypanosomiasis patients. Again, the use of cell-free extracts of promastigotes generally gave false positive results with the sera of normal human and Chagas' disease, leprosy, tuberculosis, and malaria patients in enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), dot ELISA, immunodiffusion, immunoelectrophoresis, and counter-current immunoelectrophoresis tests.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

摘要

利什曼病是一类疾病,严重程度从皮肤型(CL)、黑热病后皮肤型(PKDL)、弥漫性皮肤型(DCL)到黏膜皮肤型(MCL)和内脏型(VL)感染不等,在全球86个热带和亚热带国家呈地方性流行,每年导致75000人死亡。不同形式的利什曼病通常由不同的利什曼原虫物种引起,其具有双宿主生命周期,在宿主巨噬细胞内复制的无鞭毛体形式与在白蛉肠道内繁殖的有鞭毛体前鞭毛体形式交替出现。该疾病的VL、MCL、PKDL、DCL和CL形式可根据宿主的体液免疫反应按优先顺序排列。一般来说,细胞介导的免疫,特别是对利什曼原虫抗原的迟发型超敏反应,与CL、MCL、PKDL和治愈的VL病例相关。利什曼病的血清学诊断似乎是活检样本中寄生虫检测的一种替代方法,可通过无鞭毛体染色或培养无鞭毛体来进行,无鞭毛体可转化为前鞭毛体形式并进行复制。已经开发或采用了一系列免疫程序来证明针对利什曼原虫的体液或细胞介导的免疫反应,用于诊断和流行病学调查。此类诊断方法的敏感性和特异性取决于所用抗原的类型、来源和纯度,因为一些利什曼原虫抗原与其他微生物,特别是锥虫、分枝杆菌、疟原虫和血吸虫,具有共同的交叉反应表位。检测抗利什曼原虫抗体的血清学诊断技术在VL、CL、MCL和PKDL患者中的成功率分别约为72%至100%、23%至90%、83%和33%至100%。利什曼菌素皮肤试验(LST)对检测MCL和CL有用,成功率分别约为100%和84%。在PKDL中,抗利什曼原虫抗体滴度在一定程度上逐渐下降以及对寄生虫抗原的迟发型超敏反应增强是与该疾病慢性化相关的特征。在直接凝集试验(DAT)和免疫荧光试验(IFAT)中使用完整的前鞭毛体作为抗原来源,会与麻风病、结核病和非洲锥虫病患者的血清发生交叉反应。同样,在酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、斑点ELISA、免疫扩散、免疫电泳和对流免疫电泳试验中,使用前鞭毛体的无细胞提取物通常会使正常人和恰加斯病、麻风病、结核病及疟疾患者的血清产生假阳性结果。(摘要截取自400字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验