Suppr超能文献

死亡证明单索引作为衡量癌症登记不完整性指标的局限性。

Limitations of the death certificate only index as a measure of incompleteness of cancer registration.

作者信息

Brenner H

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1995 Aug;72(2):506-10. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1995.363.

Abstract

The death certificate only (DCO) index, which quantifies the proportion of patients for whom the death certificate provides the only notification to the registry, is a widely used measure of incompleteness of population-based cancer registration. This paper provides an algebraic assessment and a quantitative illustration of the relationship between the DCO index and incompleteness of cancer registration. It is shown that the relationship between the DCO index and incompleteness of registration is strongly dependent on the case fatality rate and the misclassification rates of cancer deaths among unregistered patients. Therefore, the DCO index is a very poor indicator of incompleteness. Similar limitations apply to the DCN index (proportion of cases first notified by death certificate), which has been proposed as an alternative measure of incompleteness.

摘要

仅死亡证明(DCO)指数用于量化死亡证明是向登记处提供唯一通知的患者比例,是广泛使用的衡量基于人群的癌症登记不完整性的指标。本文对DCO指数与癌症登记不完整性之间的关系进行了代数评估和定量说明。结果表明,DCO指数与登记不完整性之间的关系强烈依赖于病死率和未登记患者中癌症死亡的错误分类率。因此,DCO指数是一个非常差的不完整性指标。类似的局限性也适用于DCN指数(首次通过死亡证明通知的病例比例),该指数已被提议作为不完整性的替代指标。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Estimation of completeness of cancer registration.癌症登记完整性评估。
Int J Epidemiol. 1982 Dec;11(4):362-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/11.4.362.
9
Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study.注册评估方法:综述与案例研究
Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:210-20. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a036224.
10
Assessing the validity of observed cancer incidence trends.评估观察到的癌症发病率趋势的有效性。
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Feb;119(2):274-91. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113746.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验