Goto M, Liu Y, Yang X M, Ardell J L, Cohen M V, Downey J M
Department of Medicine, University of South Alabama, College of Medicine, Mobile 36688, USA.
Circ Res. 1995 Sep;77(3):611-21. doi: 10.1161/01.res.77.3.611.
Bradykinin receptor activation has been proposed to be involved in ischemic preconditioning. In the present study, we further investigated the role of this agent in preconditioning in both isolated and in situ rabbit hearts. All hearts were subjected to 30 minutes of regional ischemia followed by reperfusion for 2 hours (in vitro hearts) and 3 hours (in situ hearts). Infarct size was measured by tetrazolium staining and expressed as a percentage of the size of the risk zone. Preconditioning in situ hearts with 5 minutes of ischemia and 10 minutes of reperfusion significantly reduced infarct size to 10.2 +/- 2.2% of the risk region (P < .0005 versus control infarct size of 36.7 +/- 2.6%). Pretreatment with HOE 140 (26 micrograms/kg), a bradykinin B2 receptor blocker, did not alter infarct size in nonpreconditioned hearts (40.6 +/- 5.3% infarction) but abolished protection from ischemic preconditioning (34.1 +/- 1.6% infarction). However, when HOE 140 was administered during the initial reflow period following 5 minutes of ischemia, protection was no longer abolished (15.6 +/- 3.9% infarction versus 13.3 +/- 3.8% without HOE 140, P = NS). Bradykinin infusion in isolated hearts mimicked preconditioning, and protection was not affected by pretreatment with the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor N omega-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester or the prostaglandin synthesis inhibitor indomethacin but could be completely abolished by the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitors polymyxin B and staurosporine as well as by HOE 140. HOE 140 could not block the protection of ischemic preconditioning in isolated hearts. That failure was apparently due to the absence of blood-borne kininogens rather than autonomic nerves. When the preconditioning stimulus in the in situ model was amplified with four cycles of 5-minute ischemia/10-minute reperfusion, HOE 140 pretreatment could no longer block protection (infarct size was 10.7 +/- 3.5% versus 6.4 +/- 2.0% without HOE 140, P = NS). We propose that bradykinin receptors protect by coupling to PKC as do adenosine receptors, and blockade of either receptor will diminish the total stimulus of PKC below threshold and prevent protection. A more intense preconditioning ischemic stimulus can overcome bradykinin receptor blockade, however, by simply enhancing the amount of adenosine and possibly other agonists released.
缓激肽受体激活被认为与缺血预处理有关。在本研究中,我们进一步研究了该介质在离体和原位兔心脏预处理中的作用。所有心脏均经历30分钟的局部缺血,随后进行2小时(离体心脏)和3小时(原位心脏)的再灌注。通过四氮唑染色测量梗死面积,并表示为危险区域大小的百分比。对原位心脏进行5分钟缺血和10分钟再灌注的预处理可将梗死面积显著降低至危险区域的10.2±2.2%(与对照组梗死面积36.7±2.6%相比,P<0.0005)。用缓激肽B2受体阻滞剂HOE 140(26微克/千克)预处理,未改变未预处理心脏的梗死面积(梗死率为40.6±5.3%),但消除了缺血预处理的保护作用(梗死率为34.1±1.6%)。然而,当在5分钟缺血后的初始再灌注期给予HOE 140时,保护作用不再被消除(梗死率为15.6±3.9%,而未用HOE 140时为13.3±3.8%,P=无显著性差异)。在离体心脏中输注缓激肽模拟了预处理,且保护作用不受一氧化氮合酶抑制剂Nω-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯或前列腺素合成抑制剂吲哚美辛预处理的影响,但可被蛋白激酶C(PKC)抑制剂多粘菌素B和星形孢菌素以及HOE 140完全消除。HOE 140不能阻断离体心脏缺血预处理的保护作用。这种失败显然是由于缺乏血源性激肽原而非自主神经。当原位模型中的预处理刺激通过四个5分钟缺血/10分钟再灌注周期增强时,HOE 140预处理不再能阻断保护作用(梗死面积为10.7±3.5%,而未用HOE 140时为6.4±2.0%,P=无显著性差异)。我们提出,缓激肽受体与腺苷受体一样,通过与PKC偶联来发挥保护作用,阻断任何一种受体都会使PKC的总刺激低于阈值并阻止保护作用。然而,更强的预处理缺血刺激可以通过简单地增加腺苷和可能其他激动剂的释放量来克服缓激肽受体阻断。