Galanakis I A, Steriopoulos K A, Dretakis E K
Department of Orthopaedics-Traumatology, University of Crete, Greece.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Apr(313):206-13.
This is a prospective study of 106 patients with 37 stable and 69 unstable trochanteric fractures treated with 2 different implants: a sliding screw-plate and a triflanged nail-plate. The fractures were classified according to Jensen's modification of Evans classification. The parameter migration was compared between the 2 implants and for the various areas of placement of the screw or nail within the femoral head. For stable fractures, the migration observed was independent of the area of implant placement or the type of implant used. For unstable fractures, central placement of the sliding screw resulted in a decreased mean value of migration. When the nail was used, the mean values of migration observed were independent of the areas of placement within the femoral head. In cases of central placement, the sliding screw appeared to be superior to the triflanged nail.
这是一项针对106例患者的前瞻性研究,其中37例为稳定型股骨转子间骨折,69例为不稳定型股骨转子间骨折,分别采用两种不同的植入物进行治疗:滑动螺钉钢板和三翼钉钢板。骨折根据詹森对埃文斯分类法的改良进行分类。比较了两种植入物之间以及螺钉或髓内钉在股骨头内不同放置区域的参数移位情况。对于稳定型骨折,观察到的移位与植入物放置区域或所用植入物类型无关。对于不稳定型骨折,滑动螺钉的中央放置导致平均移位值降低。当使用髓内钉时,观察到的平均移位值与在股骨头内的放置区域无关。在中央放置的情况下,滑动螺钉似乎优于三翼钉。