• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

防御性敌意:与冠心病患者心脏缺血多种标志物的关系

Defensive hostility: relationship to multiple markers of cardiac ischemia in patients with coronary disease.

作者信息

Helmers K F, Krantz D S, Merz C N, Klein J, Kop W J, Gottdiener J S, Rozanski A

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 1995 May;14(3):202-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.202.

DOI:10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.202
PMID:7641660
Abstract

Three studies assessed whether the combined traits of hostility and defensiveness identify a group of hostile individuals with functionally severe coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD patients completed the Cook-Medley Hostility Inventory (Ho) and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MC). Patients were classified into 4 groups: defensive hostile (DH: high Ho, high MC), low hostile (LH: low Ho, low MC), high hostile (HH: high Ho, low MC), and defensive (Def: low Ho, high MC). DH in comparison to HH, LH, and Def CAD patients demonstrate the greatest perfusion defects as measured by exercise thallium scintigraphy; DH patients exhibit the most frequent ischemic episodes during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring; and in a laboratory study, DH patients exhibit the most severe mental stress-induced ischemia assessed by echocardiography. Thus, the combination of high hostility and high defensiveness are associated with more functionally severe CAD and may predispose CAD patients to a more adverse prognosis.

摘要

三项研究评估了敌意和防御性的综合特征是否能识别出一组患有功能性严重冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的敌意个体。CAD患者完成了库克-梅德利敌意量表(Ho)和马洛-克劳恩社会赞许性量表(MC)。患者被分为四组:防御性敌意组(DH:高Ho,高MC)、低敌意组(LH:低Ho,低MC)、高敌意组(HH:高Ho,低MC)和防御组(Def:低Ho,高MC)。与HH、LH和Def CAD患者相比,DH患者在运动铊闪烁扫描中显示出最大的灌注缺损;DH患者在动态心电图监测期间出现缺血发作的频率最高;在一项实验室研究中,通过超声心动图评估,DH患者表现出最严重的精神应激性缺血。因此,高敌意和高防御性的结合与功能性更严重的CAD相关,并且可能使CAD患者预后更差。

相似文献

1
Defensive hostility: relationship to multiple markers of cardiac ischemia in patients with coronary disease.防御性敌意:与冠心病患者心脏缺血多种标志物的关系
Health Psychol. 1995 May;14(3):202-9. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.14.3.202.
2
Defensive hostility, gender and cardiovascular levels and responses to stress.防御性敌意、性别与心血管水平及对压力的反应。
Ann Behav Med. 1996 Fall;18(4):246-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02895286.
3
Autonomic characteristics of defensive hostility: reactivity and recovery to active and passive stressors.防御性敌意的自主神经特征:对主动和被动应激源的反应性与恢复情况
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Nov;66(2):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.03.014. Epub 2007 May 3.
4
Defensive hostility and coronary heart disease: a preliminary investigation of male veterans.防御性敌意与冠心病:对男性退伍军人的初步调查
Psychosom Med. 2001 May-Jun;63(3):463-9. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200105000-00016.
5
Facial expression and the affective component of cynical hostility in male coronary heart disease patients.男性冠心病患者的面部表情与愤世嫉俗敌意的情感成分
Health Psychol. 1998 Jul;17(4):376-80. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.17.4.376.
6
Hostility and myocardial ischemia in coronary artery disease patients: evaluation by gender and ischemic index.冠心病患者的敌意与心肌缺血:按性别和缺血指数评估
Psychosom Med. 1993 Jan-Feb;55(1):29-36. doi: 10.1097/00006842-199301000-00006.
7
Defensive hostility and anger expression: relationship to additional heart rate reactivity during active coping.防御性敌意和愤怒表达:与积极应对期间额外的心率反应性的关系。
Psychophysiology. 1997 Mar;34(2):177-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02129.x.
8
Cook-Medley hostility, anger, and the Type A behavior pattern in Finland.芬兰的库克-梅德利敌意、愤怒与A型行为模式
Psychol Rep. 1991 Jun;68(3 Pt 2):1059-66. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1991.68.3c.1059.
9
The Cook-Medley hostility scale: item content and ability to predict survival.库克-梅德利敌意量表:项目内容及预测生存率的能力。
Psychosom Med. 1989 Jan-Feb;51(1):46-57. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198901000-00005.
10
The associations of hostility and defensiveness with telomere length are influenced by sex and health status.敌意和防御心理与端粒长度的关联受性别和健康状况的影响。
Biol Sex Differ. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13293-020-00349-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological Profiles in the Prediction of Leukocyte Telomere Length in Healthy Individuals.健康个体白细胞端粒长度预测中的心理特征
PLoS One. 2016 Oct 27;11(10):e0165482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0165482. eCollection 2016.
2
Defensive hostility, gender and cardiovascular levels and responses to stress.防御性敌意、性别与心血管水平及对压力的反应。
Ann Behav Med. 1996 Fall;18(4):246-54. doi: 10.1007/BF02895286.
3
Psychometric evaluation of a Coping Strategies Inventory Short-Form (CSI-SF) in the Jackson Heart Study cohort.
杰克逊心脏研究队列中应对策略量表简表(CSI-SF)的心理测量学评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2007 Dec;4(4):289-95. doi: 10.3390/ijerph200704040004.
4
Mental stress-induced myocardial ischemia: moving forward.精神应激诱导的心肌缺血:进展
J Nucl Cardiol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):269-71. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2007.04.009.
5
Suppressed hostility predicted hypertension incidence among middle-aged men: the normative aging study.压抑的敌意预示中年男性患高血压的几率:规范衰老研究
J Behav Med. 2005 Oct;28(5):443-54. doi: 10.1007/s10865-005-9016-5. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
6
The influence of hostility and family history of cardiovascular disease on autonomic activation in response to controllable versus noncontrollable stress, anger imagery induction, and relaxation imagery.敌意和心血管疾病家族史对自主神经激活的影响,自主神经激活是针对可控与不可控应激、愤怒意象诱导及放松意象而言的。
J Behav Med. 2005 Jun;28(3):213-21. doi: 10.1007/s10865-005-4657-y.
7
Psychosocial stress and cardiovascular disease: pathophysiological links.心理社会压力与心血管疾病:病理生理联系
Behav Med. 2002 Winter;27(4):141-7. doi: 10.1080/08964280209596039.
8
Defensiveness and individual response stereotypy in asthma.哮喘中的防御性和个体反应刻板性。
Psychosom Med. 2002 Mar-Apr;64(2):294-301. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200203000-00013.
9
Psychological status and the role of coping style after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Results of a prospective study.冠状动脉搭桥手术后的心理状态及应对方式的作用。一项前瞻性研究的结果。
Qual Life Res. 2001;10(1):37-47. doi: 10.1023/a:1016697719078.