Gori G B
Health Policy Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20816-1016, USA.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1995 Apr;21(2):281-95. doi: 10.1006/rtph.1995.1042.
Concerns about possible cardiovascular and especially coronary effects of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) derive from the reported effects of active smoking. Despite similarities, however, ETS has composition and physical characteristics different from the mainstream smoke (MS) that active smokers inhale and appears relatively more chemically inert and less biologically active. ETS doses to nonsmokers are small and often below the sensitivity of detection technologies. They are several orders of magnitude less than MS doses in active smokers. Numerous epidemiologic studies report that the active smoking of less than 10 cigarettes/day is not associated with measurable risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). Thus, even assuming that ETS and MS have equivalent biologic activities, conceivable ETS doses to nonsmokers are far below apparent no-effect thresholds for active smoking. Hence, it is no surprise that epidemiologic reports are inconclusive about a possible association of ETS exposure and CHD, some suggesting a slight elevation, others a reduction of risk. Often, the elevations reported are higher than the CHD risk values associated with active smoking. Such equivocations likely result from the presence of contrasting protective or aggravating confounders, of which more than 200 have been reported in the literature--confounders that were not and could not be adequately controlled by any epidemiologic study. By scientific standards, the weight of evidence continues to falsify the hypothesis that ETS exposure might be a CHD risk factor.
对环境烟草烟雾(ETS)可能产生的心血管影响,尤其是冠状动脉影响的担忧,源于主动吸烟已报道的影响。然而,尽管存在相似之处,但ETS的成分和物理特性与主动吸烟者吸入的主流烟雾(MS)不同,并且似乎在化学上相对更具惰性,生物活性更低。非吸烟者接触的ETS剂量很小,通常低于检测技术的灵敏度。它们比主动吸烟者的MS剂量低几个数量级。许多流行病学研究报告称,每天主动吸烟少于10支与可测量的冠心病(CHD)风险无关。因此,即使假设ETS和MS具有同等的生物活性,非吸烟者可能接触的ETS剂量也远低于主动吸烟的明显无效应阈值。因此,流行病学报告对于ETS暴露与CHD之间可能存在的关联尚无定论也就不足为奇了,一些报告表明风险略有升高,另一些则表明风险降低。通常,报告的风险升高高于与主动吸烟相关的CHD风险值。这种模棱两可的情况可能是由于存在相互矛盾的保护或加重混杂因素导致的,文献中已报道了200多种此类混杂因素——任何流行病学研究都未曾也无法充分控制这些混杂因素。按照科学标准,证据的权重继续证伪ETS暴露可能是CHD风险因素这一假设。