Schmidt H G, Moust J H
Department of Educational Development and Research, University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acad Med. 1995 Aug;70(8):708-14. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199508000-00015.
To test and further develop a causal model of the influence of tutor behaviors on student achievement and interest in the context of problem-based learning.
Data from 524 tutorial groups involving students participating in the four-year undergraduate health sciences curriculum at the University of Limburg in 1992-93 were analyzed. The tutorial groups were guided by 261 tutors. Overall, 3,792 data records were studied, with each student participating in an average of 2.3 groups. Correlations among tutors' social-congruence, expertise-use, and cognitive-congruence behaviors, small-group functioning, and student' self-study time, intrinsic interest in subject matter, and level of achievement were analyzed using structural-equations modeling. This statistical technique allows the investigator to test causal hypotheses on correlational data by comparing the structure of data with a theoretical model.
After minor adaptations, the hypothesized causal model of the effective tutor fitted the data extremely will. Each tutor's level of expertise use and social congruence not only directly affected his or her level of cognitive congruence but also affected other elements of the model. Level of social congruence influenced group functioning in a direct fashion, while expertise use had a slightly negative effect on the students' level of self-study time and a slightly positive effect on level of achievement. As hypothesized, the level of cognitive congruence influenced tutorial-group functioning. Level of group functioning affected self-study time and intrinsic interest. Finally, time spent on self-study influenced level of achievement.
The results suggest that subject-matter expertise; a commitment to students' learning and their lives in a personal, authentic way; and the ability to express oneself in the language used by the student are all determinants of learning in problem-based curricula. The theory of the effective tutor, presented in this article, merges two different perspectives prevalent in the literature. One perspective emphasizes the personal qualities of the tutor: his or her ability to communicate with students in an informal way, coupled with an empathic attitude that enables the tutor to encourage student learning by creating an atmosphere in which open exchange of ideas is facilitated. The other stresses the tutor's subject-matter knowledge as a determinant of learning. The data presented in this article suggest that what is needed, really, is much of both.
在基于问题的学习背景下,检验并进一步发展一个关于导师行为对学生成绩和兴趣影响的因果模型。
对1992 - 1993年在林堡大学参加四年制本科健康科学课程的学生所在的524个辅导小组的数据进行了分析。这些辅导小组由261名导师指导。总体而言,研究了3792条数据记录,每个学生平均参加2.3个小组。使用结构方程模型分析了导师的社会一致性、专业知识运用和认知一致性行为、小组功能以及学生的自学时间、对学科内容的内在兴趣和成绩水平之间的相关性。这种统计技术使研究者能够通过将数据结构与理论模型进行比较,来检验关于相关数据的因果假设。
经过 minor adaptations(此处可能有误,推测为minor adjustments之类的表述,可译为“轻微调整”)后,假设的有效导师因果模型与数据拟合得非常好。每位导师的专业知识运用水平和社会一致性不仅直接影响其认知一致性水平,还影响模型的其他要素。社会一致性水平直接影响小组功能,而专业知识运用对学生的自学时间水平有轻微负面影响,对成绩水平有轻微正面影响。正如假设的那样,认知一致性水平影响辅导小组功能。小组功能水平影响自学时间和内在兴趣。最后,花在自学上的时间影响成绩水平。
结果表明,学科专业知识;以个人真实的方式致力于学生的学习及其生活;以及用学生使用的语言表达自己的能力,都是基于问题的课程中学习的决定因素。本文提出的有效导师理论融合了文献中普遍存在的两种不同观点。一种观点强调导师的个人品质:他或她以非正式方式与学生交流的能力,以及一种移情态度,这种态度使导师能够通过营造促进思想开放交流的氛围来鼓励学生学习。另一种观点强调导师的学科知识是学习的决定因素。本文所呈现的数据表明,实际上,两者都不可或缺。