Schmidt H G, van der Arend A, Moust J H, Kokx I, Boon L
Department of Educational Development and Research (DEDR), University of Limburg, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Acad Med. 1993 Oct;68(10):784-91. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199310000-00018.
To investigate the effects of tutors' subject-matter expertise on students' levels of academic achievement and study effort in a problem-based health sciences curriculum. Also, to study differences in tutors' behaviors and the influences of these differences on students' performances.
Data were analyzed from 336 staff-led tutorial groups involving student participants in seven four-year undergraduate programs at the University of Limburg Faculty of Health Sciences in 1989-90. Overall, 1,925 data records were studied, with each student participating in an average of 1.7 groups led by either content experts or non-experts. The basic analyses were of (1) students' achievement scores as a function of tutors' expertise levels and students' curriculum year; (2) students' estimates of self-study time as a function of tutors' expertise levels and students' curriculum year; and (3) the average ratings of the tutors' behaviors as a function of tutors' expertise levels. Statistical methods included analysis of variance and Pearson correlations.
The students guided by subject-matter experts were shown to spend more time on self-directed study, and they achieved somewhat better than did the students guided by non-expert tutors. The effect of subject-matter expertise on achievement was strongest in the first curriculum year, suggesting that novice students are more dependent on their tutors' expertise than are more advanced students. Also, the content-expert tutors made more extensive use of their subject-matter knowledge to guide students. However, in addition to the tutors' knowledge-related behaviors, the tutors' process-facilitation skills affected student achievement. Moreover, these two sets of behaviors were correlated, indicating that both are necessary conditions for effective tutoring.
The results indicate that, at least for the curriculum studied, the assumption in the literature that tutors do not necessarily need content knowledge so long as they are skilled in the tutoring process is not entirely justified: the students who were guided by content experts achieved somewhat better and spent more time on self-directed learning. More important, tutoring skill and content knowledge seemed to be necessary and closely related conditions for effective tutoring.
探讨在以问题为基础的健康科学课程中,导师的学科专业知识对学生学业成绩水平和学习努力程度的影响。同时,研究导师行为的差异以及这些差异对学生表现的影响。
对1989 - 1990年林堡大学健康科学学院七个四年制本科项目中由工作人员主导的336个辅导小组的数据进行分析。总体而言,研究了1925条数据记录,每个学生平均参与1.7个由内容专家或非专家主导的小组。基本分析包括:(1)作为导师专业水平和学生课程年份函数的学生成绩得分;(2)作为导师专业水平和学生课程年份函数的学生自主学习时间估计;(3)作为导师专业水平函数的导师行为平均评分。统计方法包括方差分析和皮尔逊相关性分析。
结果表明,由学科专家指导的学生在自主学习上花费的时间更多,并且他们的成绩比由非专家导师指导的学生略好。学科专业知识对成绩的影响在课程的第一年最为显著,这表明新生比高年级学生更依赖导师的专业知识。此外,内容专家导师更广泛地利用他们的学科知识来指导学生。然而,除了导师与知识相关的行为外,导师的过程促进技能也影响学生成绩。而且,这两组行为是相关的,表明两者都是有效辅导的必要条件。
结果表明,至少对于所研究的课程而言,文献中认为导师只要在辅导过程中熟练就不一定需要学科知识的假设并不完全合理:由内容专家指导的学生成绩略好,并且在自主学习上花费的时间更多。更重要的是,辅导技能和学科知识似乎是有效辅导的必要且密切相关的条件。