Green M, Barbadora K, Donabedian S, Zervos M J
Division of Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1995 Jun;33(6):1554-7. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.6.1554-1557.1995.
Direct comparisons between contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) electrophoresis and field inversion gel electrophoresis (FIGE) to determine the epidemiology of antibiotic-resistant enterococci have not been previously published. Fifty non-beta-lactamase-producing, ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium isolates and 10 vancomycin-resistant E. faecium strains collected from multiple centers were analyzed in a blinded fashion by CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE after digestion with SmaI. Isolates were considered clonally related if there was a difference of three of fewer bands between electrophoretic patterns. Agreement between CHEF electrophoresis and FIGE was seen for 12 of 13 identified groups of ampicillin-resistant E. faecium and 7 of 7 groups of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. The lone discordance was accounted for by a fourth band difference between two strains recognized near 350 kb by CHEF electrophoresis but not by FIGE, placing them into different clonal groups. Better band separation was noted in the 50- to 200-kb range for FIGE, while CHEF electrophoresis revealed better resolution over 250 kb more reliably, including detection of some bands not seen on FIGE. Molecular epidemiologic investigations of E. faecium by either technique should provide comparable results.
此前尚未发表过关于轮廓钳位均匀电场(CHEF)电泳和场反转凝胶电泳(FIGE)之间直接比较以确定耐抗生素肠球菌流行病学的研究。对从多个中心收集的50株不产β-内酰胺酶、耐氨苄西林的粪肠球菌分离株和10株耐万古霉素的粪肠球菌菌株进行盲法分析,先用SmaI酶切,然后进行CHEF电泳和FIGE分析。如果电泳图谱之间的条带差异在三条或更少,则分离株被认为是克隆相关的。在13个已鉴定的耐氨苄西林粪肠球菌组中有12个组以及7个耐万古霉素粪肠球菌组中,CHEF电泳和FIGE之间的结果一致。唯一的不一致是由CHEF电泳在350 kb附近识别出的两个菌株之间存在第四条带差异,但FIGE未识别到,从而将它们归为不同的克隆组。FIGE在50至200 kb范围内条带分离效果更好,而CHEF电泳在250 kb以上能更可靠地显示出更好的分辨率,包括检测到一些在FIGE上看不到的条带。采用这两种技术对粪肠球菌进行分子流行病学调查应能提供可比的结果。