• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阅读与评估定性研究

Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies.

作者信息

Elder N C, Miller W L

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA.

出版信息

J Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;41(3):279-85.

PMID:7650507
Abstract

Qualitative research is now published across the family practice and medical literature. This article is designed to help busy family physicians decide which qualitative studies are worth reading and to provide them with the tools to appreciate and evaluate research design and analysis. By using clinical analogies, the qualitative research process can be better understood.

摘要

定性研究如今已发表于全科医学和医学文献中。本文旨在帮助忙碌的家庭医生判断哪些定性研究值得一读,并为他们提供理解和评估研究设计与分析的工具。通过运用临床类比,可以更好地理解定性研究过程。

相似文献

1
Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies.阅读与评估定性研究
J Fam Pract. 1995 Sep;41(3):279-85.
2
[Document research and self-instruction. Critical reading of a medical article--Practice guidelines--Orphan diseases. Part 3--Critical reading of a medical article. Practice guidelines].[文献研究与自学。医学文章的批判性阅读——实践指南——罕见病。第3部分——医学文章的批判性阅读。实践指南]
Rev Prat. 2005 Jun 15;55(11):1229-34.
3
An introduction to qualitative research for food and nutrition professionals.面向食品与营养专业人士的定性研究导论。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Jan;109(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2008.10.018.
4
Focus on qualitative methods: Using qualitative methods in intervention studies.
Res Nurs Health. 1996 Aug;19(4):359-64. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199608)19:4<359::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-H.
5
Reading medical articles critically. What they do not teach you in medical school.批判性地阅读医学文章。医学院里没教给你的东西。
Saudi Med J. 2004 Apr;25(4):409-23.
6
Appraising qualitative research articles in medicine and medical education.评估医学与医学教育领域的定性研究文章。
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):71-5. doi: 10.1080/01421590400016308.
7
How will we know "good" qualitative research when we see it? Beginning the dialogue in health services research.当我们看到“好的”定性研究时,我们如何识别它?开启卫生服务研究中的对话。
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1153-88.
8
Clinical research in family medicine: quantity and quality of published articles.家庭医学临床研究:已发表文章的数量与质量
Fam Med. 2003 Apr;35(4):284-8.
9
[The science of the art of medicine. Qualitative methods in medical research].[医学艺术的科学。医学研究中的定性方法]
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Aug 20;110(19):2546-9.
10
Reading research critically: the review of the literature.
J Post Anesth Nurs. 1994 Aug;9(4):240-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Paternal perinatal mental health support: fathers' perspectives on barriers, facilitators, and preferences.父亲围产期心理健康支持:父亲对障碍、促进因素及偏好的看法
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Mar 20;5(1):39. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00165-x.
2
The psychosocial beliefs, experiences and expectations of children living with obesity.肥胖儿童的心理社会信念、经历和期望。
Health Expect. 2024 Feb;27(1):e13973. doi: 10.1111/hex.13973.
3
Listening to voices from multiple sources: A qualitative text analysis of the emotional experiences of women living with breast cancer in China.
倾听多方声音:中国乳腺癌患者情感体验的定性文本分析。
Front Public Health. 2023 Feb 3;11:1114139. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1114139. eCollection 2023.
4
In search of well-established evaluative criteria for the emerging qualitative methods of L2 affective variables.寻找适用于新兴的二语情感变量定性研究方法的既定评估标准。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 25;13:995761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.995761. eCollection 2022.
5
Patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives on implementing a tailored stratified treatment approach for low back pain in Nigeria: a qualitative study.患者和物理治疗师对在尼日利亚实施针对腰痛的个体化分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e059736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059736.
6
What do women at high risk of breast cancer request of a patient education day? Focus interviews with women before and after deciding about prophylactic interventions.高乳腺癌风险女性对患者教育日的需求是什么?在决定预防性干预措施之前和之后对女性进行焦点访谈。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2022 Jul;31(4):e13588. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13588. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
7
Pharmacy students' perspectives on the initial implementation of a teaching electronic medical record: results from a mixed-methods assessment.药学专业学生对教学电子病历初步实施的看法:一项混合方法评估的结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Jun 9;20(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02091-8.
8
Systematic mapping of existing tools to appraise methodological strengths and limitations of qualitative research: first stage in the development of the CAMELOT tool.系统梳理现有工具,以评估定性研究方法的优缺点:CAMELOT 工具开发的第一阶段。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0728-6.
9
Medical Students' (Dis)comfort with Assessing Religious and Spiritual Needs in a Standardized Patient Encounter.医学生在标准化患者就诊中评估宗教和精神需求时的(不适)感。
J Relig Health. 2019 Feb;58(1):246-258. doi: 10.1007/s10943-018-0714-z.
10
Users' guide to the surgical literature: how to assess a qualitative study.外科文献用户指南:如何评估定性研究。
Can J Surg. 2018 Jun;61(3):208-214. doi: 10.1503/cjs.013117.