Teff K L, Devine J, Engelman K
Monell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Physiol Behav. 1995 Jun;57(6):1089-95. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00373-d.
To determine whether sweet-tasting solutions are effective elicitors of cephalic phase insulin release (CPIR) in humans, two studies were conducted using nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners as stimuli. Normal weight men sipped and spit four different solutions: water, aspartame, saccharin, and sucrose. A fifth condition involved a modified sham-feed with apple pie. The five stimuli were administered in counterbalanced order, each on a separate day. In study 1, subjects tasted the stimuli for 1 min (n = 15) and in study 2 (n = 16), they tasted the stimuli for 3 min. Arterialized venous blood was drawn to establish a baseline and then at 1 min poststimulus, followed by every 2 min for 15 min and then every 5 min for 15 min. In both study 1 and study 2, no significant increases in plasma insulin were observed after subjects tasted the sweetened solutions. In contrast, significant increases in plasma insulin occurred after the modified sham-feed with both the 1 min and 3 min exposure. These results suggest that nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners in solution are not adequate stimuli for the elicitation of CPIR.
为了确定甜味溶液是否能有效引发人体头期胰岛素释放(CPIR),研究人员使用营养性和非营养性甜味剂作为刺激物进行了两项研究。正常体重的男性抿一口并吐出四种不同的溶液:水、阿斯巴甜、糖精和蔗糖。第五种情况是进行吃苹果派的模拟假饲。这五种刺激物以平衡顺序给药,每次在不同的一天进行。在研究1中,受试者品尝刺激物1分钟(n = 15),在研究2中(n = 16),他们品尝刺激物3分钟。采集动脉化静脉血以建立基线,然后在刺激后1分钟采集,随后每2分钟采集一次,共采集15分钟,然后每5分钟采集一次,共采集15分钟。在研究1和研究2中,受试者品尝甜味溶液后,血浆胰岛素均未观察到显著增加。相比之下,在进行1分钟和3分钟暴露的模拟假饲后,血浆胰岛素显著增加。这些结果表明,溶液中的营养性和非营养性甜味剂不是引发CPIR的充分刺激物。