Dhillon Jaapna, Lee Janice Y, Mattes Richard D
Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, 226 Stone Hall, 700 W State Street, West Lafayette 47907, IN, USA.
Physiol Behav. 2017 Nov 1;181:100-109. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
The purpose of the study was to examine the role of the cephalic phase insulin response (CPIR) following exposure to nutritive and low-calorie sweeteners in solid and beverage form in overweight and obese adults. In addition, the role of learning on the CPIR to nutritive and low-calorie sweetener exposure was tested. Sixty-four overweight and obese adults (age: 18-50years, BMI: 24-37kg/m, body fat percentage>25% for men and >32% for women) were sham-fed (at 2-minute intervals for 14min) a randomly assigned test load comprised of a nutritive (sucrose) or low-calorie sweetener (sucralose) in beverage or solid form in phase 1 of the study. A 2-3ml blood sample was collected before and 2, 6, 10, 14, 61, 91 and 121min after oral exposure for serum insulin and glucose analysis. During phase 2, participants underwent a 2-week training period to facilitate associative learning between the sensory properties of test loads and their post-ingestive effects. In phase 3, participants were retested for their cephalic phase responses as in phase 1. Participants were classified as responders if they demonstrated a positive insulin response (rise of serum insulin above baseline i.e. Δ insulin) 2min post-stimulus in phase 1. Among responders exposed to the same sweetener in Phases 1 and 3, the proportion of participants that displayed a rise of insulin with oral exposure to sucralose was significantly greater when the stimulus was in the solid form compared to the beverage form. Sucralose and sucrose exposure elicited similarly significant increases in serum insulin 2min after exposure and significant decreases after 2min in responders in both food forms. The solid food form elicited greater CPIR over 2, 6 and 10min than the beverage form. There was no effect of learning on insulin responses after training. The results indicate the presence of a significant CPIR in a subset of individuals with overweight or obesity after oral exposure to sucralose, especially when present in solid food form. Future studies must confirm the reliability of this response.
该研究的目的是探讨超重和肥胖成年人在摄入固体和饮料形式的营养性甜味剂和低热量甜味剂后,头期胰岛素反应(CPIR)的作用。此外,还测试了学习对CPIR针对营养性和低热量甜味剂暴露的影响。64名超重和肥胖成年人(年龄:18 - 50岁,BMI:24 - 37kg/m²,男性体脂百分比>25%,女性>32%)在研究的第一阶段接受假饲(每隔2分钟进行14分钟),随机分配的测试负荷为饮料或固体形式的营养性(蔗糖)或低热量甜味剂(三氯蔗糖)。在口服暴露前以及暴露后2、6、10、14、61、91和121分钟采集2 - 3ml血样,用于血清胰岛素和葡萄糖分析。在第二阶段,参与者接受为期2周的训练期,以促进测试负荷的感官特性与其摄入后效应之间的联想学习。在第三阶段,参与者如在第一阶段一样重新测试其头期反应。如果参与者在第一阶段刺激后2分钟表现出阳性胰岛素反应(血清胰岛素高于基线即Δ胰岛素升高),则被分类为反应者。在第一阶段和第三阶段暴露于相同甜味剂的反应者中,与饮料形式相比,当刺激为固体形式时,口服三氯蔗糖后胰岛素升高的参与者比例显著更高。在两种食物形式中,三氯蔗糖和蔗糖暴露在暴露后2分钟均引起血清胰岛素类似的显著升高,在反应者中2分钟后显著降低。固体食物形式在2、6和10分钟内引起的CPIR比饮料形式更大。训练后学习对胰岛素反应没有影响。结果表明,超重或肥胖个体的一个亚组在口服三氯蔗糖后存在显著的CPIR,尤其是当三氯蔗糖以固体食物形式存在时。未来的研究必须证实这种反应的可靠性。