• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Can we get people to participate in a study of sexual behavior?

作者信息

Peterman T A

机构信息

Division of STD/HIV Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):164-8. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00007.

DOI:10.1097/00007435-199505000-00007
PMID:7652660
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Interpreting the results of any study requires careful analysis to determine how selective participation may have influenced the findings. Participation in a study of sexual behavior may be influenced by who is doing the study, who the participants are, what it means to participate, what the study involves, and what is meant by sexual behavior.

GOAL OF THIS STUDY

Identify potential sources of bias that could be detected by asking the question "Can we get people to participate in a study of sexual behavior?"

STUDY DESIGN

Review of important examples of participation bias from the literature. Examination of a convenience sample of key studies of sexual behavior to see how they have addressed participation-related issues.

RESULTS

There are many examples of studies where misleading results were caused by participation bias. Many key studies of sexual behavior did not address fully the potential impact of selective participation.

CONCLUSION

No study is completely without participation bias. Understanding potential sources of bias is essential when designing a study or interpreting the results.

摘要

相似文献

1
Can we get people to participate in a study of sexual behavior?
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):164-8. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00007.
2
Rapid assessment of sexual behavior, drug use, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted diseases in northern thai youth using audio-computer-assisted self-interviewing and noninvasive specimen collection.采用音频计算机辅助自我访谈和非侵入性样本采集对泰国北部青少年的性行为、吸毒情况、人类免疫缺陷病毒及性传播疾病进行快速评估。
Pediatrics. 2001 Jul;108(1):E13. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.e13.
3
Reliability of sexual histories in heterosexual couples.
Sex Transm Dis. 1995 May-Jun;22(3):169-72. doi: 10.1097/00007435-199505000-00008.
4
Participation bias in a sexuality survey: psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders.一项性取向调查中的参与偏差:应答者与非应答者的心理及行为特征
Int J Epidemiol. 1997 Aug;26(4):844-54. doi: 10.1093/ije/26.4.844.
5
Feasibility of comparing risk profiles for cervical cancer between participants and nonparticipants in a screening programme.比较筛查项目参与者与非参与者宫颈癌风险特征的可行性。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Sep;12(3):204-8. doi: 10.3109/02813439409003700.
6
Estimating sexual behaviour parameters in the light of AIDS: a review of recent UK studies of young people.根据艾滋病情况估算性行为参数:对英国近期有关年轻人的研究综述
AIDS Care. 1992;4(2):187-201. doi: 10.1080/09540129208253090.
7
Gender differences in HIV disclosure, stigma, and perceptions of health.艾滋病毒披露、耻辱感及健康认知方面的性别差异。
AIDS Care. 2014;26(11):1419-25. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2014.921278. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
Social cohesion, social trust, social participation and sexual behaviors of adolescents in rural Tanzania.坦桑尼亚农村青少年的社会凝聚力、社会信任、社会参与和性行为。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Feb 14;19(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6428-7.
9
Interpreting sexual behaviour data: validity issues in the multicentre study on factors determining the differential spread of HIV in four African cities.解读性行为数据:关于决定艾滋病病毒在四个非洲城市不同传播因素的多中心研究中的有效性问题。
AIDS. 2001 Aug;15 Suppl 4:S117-26. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200108004-00013.
10
Self-selection bias in an epidemiological study of respiratory health of a rural population.农村人群呼吸系统健康的流行病学研究中的自我选择偏倚。
J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):316-25. doi: 10.1080/1059924X.2012.686381.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences between completers and early dropouts from 2 HIV intervention trials: a health belief approach to understanding prevention program attrition.两项HIV干预试验中完成者与早期退出者的差异:一种基于健康信念的方法来理解预防项目的人员流失情况。
Am J Public Health. 1998 Jul;88(7):1068-73. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.7.1068.