• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

XPERT非接触眼压计与传统戈德曼压平眼压计的临床比较。

Clinical comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer.

作者信息

Hansen M K

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Aalborg Hospital, Denmark.

出版信息

Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995 Apr;73(2):176-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1995.tb00664.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0420.1995.tb00664.x
PMID:7656151
Abstract

Intraocular pressure (IOP) in the right eye of 113 patients was measured with one XPERT NCT air-puff non-contact tonometer (XPERT) and compared with IOP measured with one Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Precision of the methods was judged by variance analysis, indicating that GAT was slightly more precise than XPERT. The slope of the linear relationship between the methods did not differ significantly from 1.0. Mean difference between the methods was 0.92 mmHg, XPERT measuring lower than GAT, p = 0.00017. The intra-individual difference between methods ranged from -8.00 to 8.67 mmHg, and standard deviation (SD) of differences was 2.52 mmHg. The 95% limits of agreement between the two methods were -5.85 to 4.01 mmHg. The SD of differences is of approximately the same size as previous XPERT vs GAT as well as previous GAT vs GAT studies.

摘要

使用一台XPERT NCT气吹式非接触眼压计(XPERT)测量了113例患者右眼的眼压,并与使用一台Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)测量的眼压进行比较。通过方差分析判断方法的精密度,结果表明GAT比XPERT稍精确。两种方法之间线性关系的斜率与1.0无显著差异。两种方法的平均差异为0.92 mmHg,XPERT测量值低于GAT,p = 0.00017。两种方法之间的个体内差异范围为-8.00至8.67 mmHg,差异的标准差(SD)为2.52 mmHg。两种方法之间的95%一致性界限为-5.85至4.01 mmHg。差异的SD与之前XPERT与GAT以及之前GAT与GAT研究的大小大致相同。

相似文献

1
Clinical comparison of the XPERT non-contact tonometer and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer.XPERT非接触眼压计与传统戈德曼压平眼压计的临床比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1995 Apr;73(2):176-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.1995.tb00664.x.
2
Agreement among Goldmann applanation tonometer, iCare, and Icare PRO rebound tonometers; non-contact tonometer; and Tonopen XL in healthy elderly subjects.健康老年受试者中戈德曼压平眼压计、iCare眼压计、Icare PRO回弹式眼压计、非接触眼压计和Tonopen XL眼压计之间的一致性
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;38(2):687-696. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0518-2. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
3
XPERT NCT--a clinical evaluation.Xpert NCT——一项临床评估。
J Am Optom Assoc. 1990 Nov;61(11):863-9.
4
[Comparison of tonometry with the Keeler air puff non-contact tonometer "Pulsair" and the Goldmann applanation tonometer].[使用Keeler气吹式非接触眼压计“Pulsair”与Goldmann压平眼压计测量眼压的比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1990 Oct;197(4):329-34. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1046288.
5
[Prospective comparison of the new indentation tonometer TGdC-01, the non-contact tonometer PT100 and the conventional Goldmann applanation tonometer].新型压陷式眼压计TGdC-01、非接触眼压计PT100与传统Goldmann压平眼压计的前瞻性比较
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2004 Sep;221(9):762-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-813566.
6
[Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare Home rebound tonometer (model TA022) and comparison with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients].[使用Icare Home回弹式眼压计(型号TA022)测量青光眼患者眼压的可靠性和可重复性及其与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较]
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2017 Dec;40(10):865-875. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2017.06.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
7
A clinical comparison of the Xpert non-contact tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer after penetrating keratoplasty.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000 Apr;78(2):211-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002211.x.
8
Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals.非接触眼压测量法与戈德曼压平眼压测量法之间眼压测量值的差异以及中央角膜厚度在影响青光眼转诊中的作用。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Feb;188(1):321-325. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1795-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
[The American Optical non-contact tonometer and its results compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer (author's transl)].
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1980 Nov;177(5):634-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1057700.
10
[Intraocular pressure measurements with the Proview self-tonometer in comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes].[使用Proview自动眼压计测量眼压并与Goldmann压平眼压计在健康眼和青光眼眼中的测量结果进行比较]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2006 Nov;223(11):899-903. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-927094.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of the Accuracy of Air-puff Tonometer Compared to Goldmann and Schiotz Tonometers among Egyptians.
J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2025 Apr-Jun;19(2):75-78. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1464. Epub 2025 Jul 31.
2
Clinical Assessment of Automated Non-Contact Tonometer: Interchangeability with Goldmann Applanation Tonometry and Repeatability.自动非接触眼压计的临床评估:与戈德曼压平眼压计的互换性及可重复性
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2726. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082726.
3
How to Measure Intraocular Pressure: An Updated Review of Various Tonometers.如何测量眼压:各种眼压计的最新综述
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 27;10(17):3860. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173860.
4
Accuracy and reliability of measurements obtained with a noncontact tono-pachymeter for clinical use in mass screening.临床应用于大规模筛查的非接触眼压计测量的准确性和可靠性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 26;11(1):8900. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88364-8.
5
Comparison of the corrected intraocular pressure by tonopachy with that of Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal and glaucomatous patients.在正常和青光眼患者中,比较tono-pachy校正眼压与Goldmann压平眼压测量法的眼压。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;68(4):620-626. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_570_19.
6
Comparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects.三种不同非接触眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计测量非青光眼患者眼压的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 2;17(1):199. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0593-1.
7
Rebound tonometry in children: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.儿童眼压反弹:美国眼科学会报告。
Ophthalmology. 2013 Apr;120(4):e21-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.058. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
8
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the portable PT100 noncontact tonometer and goldmann applanation tonometry.使用便携式PT100非接触眼压计和戈德曼压平眼压计测量眼压的比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2009;3:341-4. doi: 10.2147/opth.s5537. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
9
Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness.回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平式眼压计的比较及其与中央角膜厚度的相关性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;90(7):833-5. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2005.089870. Epub 2006 May 3.
10
A comparison of four methods of tonometry: method agreement and interobserver variability.四种眼压测量方法的比较:方法一致性和观察者间变异性
Br J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jul;89(7):847-50. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2004.056614.