Jordanoglou J, Koulouris N, Kyroussis D, Rapakoulias P, Vassalos P, Madianos J
Department of Respiratory Medicine, University of Athens Medical School, Greece.
Thorax. 1995 Mar;50(3):240-4. doi: 10.1136/thx.50.3.240.
The measurement of effective alveolar carbon dioxide tension (PA-CO2eff) is still a matter of debate. It has, however, become common practice to use arterial instead of alveolar CO2 tension for computing alveolar oxygen tension (PAO2) and physiological dead space, not only in normal subjects but also in patients. The purpose of this study was to estimate alveolar CO2 tension during spontaneous breathing with a new bedside technique which is simple and non-invasive, and to compare these values with arterial CO2 tension measured in normal subjects and patients with chronic airways obstruction.
The subjects breathed quietly through the equipment assembly (mouthpiece, monitoring ring, Fleisch transducer head) connected to a pneumotachograph and a fast response infrared CO2 analyser. The method is a computerised calculation of the volume weighted effective alveolar CO2 tension obtained from the simultaneously recorded expiratory flow and CO2 concentration versus time curves. An arterial blood sample was taken to measure PaCO2 for comparison during the study.
The results showed a mean difference (PACO2eff-PaCO2) of -0.205 kPa in 20 normal subjects and -0.460 kPa in 46 patients. The 95% confidence interval of the bias was -0.029 to -0.379 kPa in normal subjects and -0.213 to -0.707 kPa in patients. The limits of agreement between PACO2eff and PaCO2 were 0.526 to -0.935 in normal subjects and 1.170 to -2.088 in patients.
The volume weighted effective alveolar PCO2 in normal subjects and patients with chronic airways obstruction is lower than the arterial PCO2 and is recommended as a better estimate in the classical equations for estimating dead space and intrapulmonary shunt.
有效肺泡二氧化碳分压(PA-CO2eff)的测量仍存在争议。然而,不仅在正常受试者中,而且在患者中,使用动脉血二氧化碳分压而非肺泡二氧化碳分压来计算肺泡氧分压(PAO2)和生理死腔已成为普遍做法。本研究的目的是采用一种简单且无创的新床旁技术,估计自主呼吸时的肺泡二氧化碳分压,并将这些值与正常受试者和慢性气道阻塞患者测量的动脉血二氧化碳分压进行比较。
受试者通过连接到呼吸流速仪和快速反应红外二氧化碳分析仪的设备组件(咬嘴、监测环、 Fleisch 传感器头)安静呼吸。该方法是通过计算机计算从同时记录的呼气流量和二氧化碳浓度随时间变化曲线获得的体积加权有效肺泡二氧化碳分压。在研究期间采集动脉血样本测量 PaCO2 以作比较。
结果显示,20 名正常受试者的平均差值(PACO2eff-PaCO2)为 -0.205 kPa,46 名患者为 -0.460 kPa。正常受试者偏差的 95% 置信区间为 -0.029 至 -0.379 kPa,患者为 -0.213 至 -0.707 kPa。PACO2eff 和 PaCO2 之间的一致性界限在正常受试者中为 0.526 至 -0.935,在患者中为 1.170 至 -2.088。
正常受试者和慢性气道阻塞患者的体积加权有效肺泡 PCO2 低于动脉 PCO2,建议在估算死腔和肺内分流的经典公式中作为更好的估计值。