• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断可靠性:过程研究

Diagnostic reliability: a study of the process.

作者信息

O'Connell B

出版信息

Nurs Diagn. 1995 Jul-Sep;6(3):99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1995.tb00495.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1744-618x.1995.tb00495.x
PMID:7662437
Abstract

The clinical use of nursing diagnosis raises questions in relation to reliability. Specifically, do nurses who assess the same patient identify similar nursing diagnoses? Student and registered nurses (N = 100) were asked to assess a "patient" and list the nursing diagnoses. Professional actors played the part of the patient and responded according to the script. The total number of correct and incorrect diagnoses listed for each assessment was recorded. Data were analyzed using MANOVA. The results revealed some discrepancy in the way in which nurses state similar patient problems and highlight areas of strengths and concerns in relation to the diagnostic concept.

摘要

护理诊断的临床应用引发了有关可靠性的问题。具体而言,评估同一位患者的护士是否会确定相似的护理诊断?学生护士和注册护士(N = 100)被要求评估一名“患者”并列出护理诊断。专业演员扮演患者并按照脚本做出回应。记录每次评估列出的正确和错误诊断的总数。使用多变量方差分析对数据进行分析。结果显示,护士陈述相似患者问题的方式存在一些差异,并突出了与诊断概念相关的优势和关注点领域。

相似文献

1
Diagnostic reliability: a study of the process.诊断可靠性:过程研究
Nurs Diagn. 1995 Jul-Sep;6(3):99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1995.tb00495.x.
2
Simulations--a means of teaching and standardizing diagnoses made.模拟——一种教学及使诊断标准化的手段。
Nurs Diagn. 1995 Jul-Sep;6(3):95. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1995.tb00492.x.
3
Staff nurse identification of nursing diagnosis from a written case study.注册护士从书面病例研究中识别护理诊断。
Nurs Diagn. 1992 Jan-Mar;3(1):30-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1992.tb00195.x.
4
Clinical referents for nursing diagnoses.护理诊断的临床参考依据。
J Neurosci Nurs. 1992 Apr;24(2):94-8. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199204000-00008.
5
Three phases of research in validating nursing diagnoses.验证护理诊断的三个研究阶段。
West J Nurs Res. 1997 Jun;19(3):379-99. doi: 10.1177/019394599701900308.
6
Nursing diagnoses for hospitalized patients with AIDS.
Nurs Diagn. 1996 Jan-Mar;7(1):9-18.
7
Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses.超越护理诊断的内容验证。
Nurs Diagn. 1998 Oct-Dec;9(4):144-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1998.tb00184.x.
8
Quantitative methods for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses.护理诊断临床验证的定量方法。
Clin Nurse Spec. 1995 Nov;9(6):306-11. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199511000-00007.
9
Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses.护理诊断研究验证的过程与方法。
Nurs Diagn. 1999 Jan-Mar;10(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1999.tb00016.x.
10
Concept analysis as foundational to nursing diagnosis research.概念分析是护理诊断研究的基础。
Nurs Diagn. 1995 Apr-Jun;6(2):91-2.