• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理诊断的临床参考依据。

Clinical referents for nursing diagnoses.

作者信息

Grant J S, Kinney M R

机构信息

University of Alabama, School of Nursing, Birmingham 35294-1210.

出版信息

J Neurosci Nurs. 1992 Apr;24(2):94-8. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199204000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/01376517-199204000-00008
PMID:1602177
Abstract

Validation of nursing diagnoses is an essential step in developing knowledge for nursing practice and should be a major goal of the discipline. Nursing diagnoses must have clinical referents, that is, defining characteristics which appear in patient populations exhibiting specific nursing diagnoses. Selecting nursing diagnoses for patient populations, developing a list of defining characteristics and operational definitions for a nursing diagnosis, selecting a standard to discriminate among subjects and constructing an instrument to document the occurrence of defining characteristics in selected patient populations are preliminary steps in identifying clinical referents. Methodological concerns addressed in establishing clinical referents for nursing diagnoses included controlling confounding factors, determining sample size, conducting a pilot study, determining interrater reliability, selecting appropriate statistical tests, and identifying critical defining characteristics for a nursing diagnosis.

摘要

护理诊断的验证是发展护理实践知识的关键步骤,应成为该学科的主要目标。护理诊断必须有临床依据,即出现在表现出特定护理诊断的患者群体中的定义性特征。为患者群体选择护理诊断、制定护理诊断的定义性特征列表和操作定义、选择区分受试者的标准以及构建记录选定患者群体中定义性特征出现情况的工具,是确定临床依据的初步步骤。在为护理诊断确定临床依据时涉及的方法学问题包括控制混杂因素、确定样本量、进行预试验、确定评定者间信度、选择适当的统计检验以及识别护理诊断的关键定义性特征。

相似文献

1
Clinical referents for nursing diagnoses.护理诊断的临床参考依据。
J Neurosci Nurs. 1992 Apr;24(2):94-8. doi: 10.1097/01376517-199204000-00008.
2
Using the Delphi technique to examine the content validity of nursing diagnoses.运用德尔菲法检验护理诊断的内容效度。
Nurs Diagn. 1992 Jan-Mar;3(1):12-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1992.tb00193.x.
3
Validation of addictions nursing diagnoses in a sample of alcohol abstainers 1 year posttreatment.戒酒者治疗一年后样本中成瘾护理诊断的验证
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 1992 Dec;6(6):340-6. doi: 10.1016/0883-9417(92)90086-x.
4
Quantitative methods for clinical validation of nursing diagnoses.护理诊断临床验证的定量方法。
Clin Nurse Spec. 1995 Nov;9(6):306-11. doi: 10.1097/00002800-199511000-00007.
5
Three phases of research in validating nursing diagnoses.验证护理诊断的三个研究阶段。
West J Nurs Res. 1997 Jun;19(3):379-99. doi: 10.1177/019394599701900308.
6
Processes and methodologies for research validation of nursing diagnoses.护理诊断研究验证的过程与方法。
Nurs Diagn. 1999 Jan-Mar;10(1):5-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1999.tb00016.x.
7
Moving beyond content validation of nursing diagnoses.超越护理诊断的内容验证。
Nurs Diagn. 1998 Oct-Dec;9(4):144-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1998.tb00184.x.
8
Diagnostic reliability: a study of the process.诊断可靠性:过程研究
Nurs Diagn. 1995 Jul-Sep;6(3):99-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1995.tb00495.x.
9
The need for operational definitions for defining characteristics.对用于定义特征的操作定义的需求。
Nurs Diagn. 1991 Oct-Dec;2(4):181-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1991.tb00356.x.
10
Expert validation and differentiation of the nursing diagnoses anxiety and fear.护理诊断焦虑和恐惧的专家验证与鉴别
Nurs Diagn. 1994 Oct-Dec;5(4):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-618x.1994.tb00263.x.