Burrow M F, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T
Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Department of Operative Dentistry, Japan.
Dent Mater. 1994 Jul;10(4):241-6. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(94)90068-x.
The purpose of this study was to investigate what influence the two variables of dentin depth and age may have on the tensile bond strengths of three bonding systems.
Dentin discs prepared from human molars were divided into young and old, superficial and deep surfaces. Three bonding systems, Scotchbond Multi-purpose (3M Dental Products), Superbond D-liner (Sun Medical Co.), and Liner Bond II (Kuraray Co.) were the materials tested for tensile bond strength. In addition, the structural variation of the resin-impregnated, or hybrid, layer was compared among the two variables and three bonding systems.
Tensile bond strengths exceeding 10 MPa were obtained for all materials. After ANOVA, an effect on tensile bond strength could be attributed to dentin age or depth for only Superbond D-liner used on deep-young dentin as compared with old-superficial dentin. All other group comparisons failed to show any variation between dentin depth or age. However, specimens bonded to deeper dentin showed slightly lower strengths. SEM observations showed thicker resin-impregnated layers for Scotchbond MP and Superbond D-liner compared with Liner Bond II. Liner Bond II exhibited a thinner and more diffuse resin-impregnated layer, believed to be due to the different dentin conditioning method.
Dentin age or depth may not show as great an influence on bond strengths with the newer type of bonding systems. The resin-impregnated layer quality, rather than thickness, is believed to be the most important factor for obtaining high tensile bond strengths.
本研究旨在调查牙本质深度和年龄这两个变量对三种粘结系统拉伸粘结强度可能产生的影响。
从人类磨牙制备的牙本质片被分为年轻和年老、表层和深层。三种粘结系统,即3M多功能粘结剂(3M牙科产品公司)、超级粘结剂D-衬层(太阳医疗公司)和衬层粘结剂II(可乐丽公司),作为测试拉伸粘结强度的材料。此外,还比较了在这两个变量和三种粘结系统中树脂浸渍或混合层的结构变化。
所有材料的拉伸粘结强度均超过10MPa。方差分析后,与年老表层牙本质相比,仅在年轻深层牙本质上使用的超级粘结剂D-衬层,其拉伸粘结强度受牙本质年龄或深度的影响。所有其他组间比较均未显示出牙本质深度或年龄之间的任何差异。然而,粘结到较深牙本质的标本显示出略低的强度。扫描电子显微镜观察显示,与衬层粘结剂II相比,3M多功能粘结剂和超级粘结剂D-衬层的树脂浸渍层更厚。衬层粘结剂II表现出更薄且更弥散的树脂浸渍层,据信这是由于不同的牙本质预处理方法所致。
牙本质年龄或深度对新型粘结系统的粘结强度可能没有太大影响。树脂浸渍层的质量而非厚度,被认为是获得高拉伸粘结强度的最重要因素。