Gleaves D H, Eberenz K P
Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843-4235, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 1995 Jul;18(1):99-102. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199507)18:1<99::aid-eat2260180111>3.0.co;2-b.
Dissociative symptomatology has been reported among patients with eating disorders, necessitating the availability of valid assessment instruments. In the current investigation, we examined the construct-related validity of two self-report instruments for assessing dissociative symptoms: the Dissociative Experiences Scale and the Trauma Symptom Checklist-40. The instruments were administered, along with instruments measuring depressive, anorexic, and bulimic symptomatology, to a sample of 125 eating disordered subjects. The dissociation measures demonstrated good convergent and discriminant validity, with a convergent validity coefficient (r = .73) that was approximately equal to that for the instruments measuring each of the three other psychological constructs. A principal components analysis further supported the construct-related validity of the dissociation scales. Severity of dissociative symptoms was generally unrelated to anorexic or bulimic symptomatology, but was significantly associated with depression. The results supported the construct validity of the dissociation instruments and the general status of dissociation as a valid and well-defined psychological phenomenon.
进食障碍患者中曾有分离症状学的相关报道,因此需要有效的评估工具。在本次调查中,我们检验了两种用于评估分离症状的自陈式工具与结构相关的效度:分离体验量表和创伤症状检查表-40。我们将这些工具,连同测量抑郁、厌食和贪食症状学的工具,施用于125名进食障碍受试者的样本。分离测量显示出良好的聚合效度和区分效度,其聚合效度系数(r = 0.73)与测量其他三种心理结构的工具的效度系数大致相当。主成分分析进一步支持了分离量表与结构相关的效度。分离症状的严重程度通常与厌食或贪食症状学无关,但与抑郁显著相关。结果支持了分离工具的结构效度以及分离作为一种有效且定义明确的心理现象的总体状况。