• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Facilitatory and detrimental effects of parafascicular electrical stimulation upon two-way active avoidance conditioning in rats.

作者信息

Guillazo-Blanch G, Vale-Martínez A, Martí-Nicolovius M, Morgado-Bernal I

机构信息

Departament de Psicologia de la Salut, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 May;63(3):209-12. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1023.

DOI:10.1006/nlme.1995.1023
PMID:7670832
Abstract

To evaluate whether post-training parafascicular intracranial electrical stimulation (PF ICS) can improve acquisition (five sessions, one daily, 10 trials each) and long-term retention (LTR) (one session, 10 trials) of two-way active avoidance conditioning in rats, experimental subjects (Ss) were implanted with an electrode at the parafascicular nucleus (PF). Control Ss were sham operated without implanted electrodes. Immediately after each acquisition session Ss in the experimental groups were stimulated in the PF during 2- or 10-min periods. After histological analyses Ss were grouped according to the antero-posterior PF stereotaxic coordinates for the electrode tip locations. Ss stimulated at the posterior PF area improved acquisition and the central PF area showed detrimental effects upon conditioning. Electrical stimulation of the anterior PF area did not affect conditioning performance. We conclude that PF appears to have differential modulatory roles in acquisition and retention of two-way active avoidance depending on the PF area involved.

摘要

相似文献

1
Facilitatory and detrimental effects of parafascicular electrical stimulation upon two-way active avoidance conditioning in rats.
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 May;63(3):209-12. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.1023.
2
Effects of parafascicular electrical stimulation and lesion upon two-way active avoidance in rats.束旁电刺激和损伤对大鼠双向主动回避的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1995 Nov;64(3):215-25. doi: 10.1006/nlme.1995.0004.
3
Parafascicular electrical stimulation attenuates nucleus basalis magnocellularis lesion-induced active avoidance retention deficit.束旁电刺激可减轻基底大细胞核损伤诱导的主动回避记忆保持缺陷。
Behav Brain Res. 2003 Sep 15;144(1-2):37-48. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(03)00060-3.
4
Differential site-specific effects of parafascicular stimulation on active avoidance in rats.
Behav Brain Res. 1998 Jun;93(1-2):107-18. doi: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00149-6.
5
The parafascicular nucleus and two-way active avoidance: effects of electrical stimulation and electrode implantation.束旁核与双向主动回避:电刺激和电极植入的影响
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Dec;129(4):605-14. doi: 10.1007/s002210050930.
6
Involvement of the parafascicular nucleus in the facilitative effect of intracranial self-stimulation on active avoidance in rats.束旁核在颅内自我刺激对大鼠主动回避的促进作用中的参与。
Brain Res. 1998 Oct 19;808(2):220-31. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00845-2.
7
Posttraining intracranial self-stimulation ameliorates the detrimental effects of parafascicular thalamic lesions on active avoidance in young and aged rats.
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Apr;117(2):246-56. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.2.246.
8
Differential effects of parafascicular electrical stimulation on active avoidance depending on the retention time, in rats.大鼠中,束旁核电刺激对主动回避行为的不同影响取决于记忆保持时间。
Brain Res Bull. 2000 Jul 15;52(5):419-26. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(00)00280-x.
9
Effects of parafascicular excitotoxic lesions on two-way active avoidance and odor-discrimination.束旁核兴奋毒性损伤对双向主动回避和气味辨别能力的影响。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2007 Sep;88(2):198-207. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 16.
10
Effects of electrical stimulation of the nucleus basalis on two-way active avoidance acquisition, retention, and retrieval.基底核电刺激对双向主动回避学习、记忆保持及记忆提取的影响。
Behav Brain Res. 2004 Sep 23;154(1):41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2004.01.017.