• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改变限频单周期刺激的极性对人类听觉脑干反应的影响。

The effects of reversing the polarity of frequency-limited single-cycle stimuli on the human auditory brain stem response.

作者信息

Orlando M S, Folsom R C

机构信息

University of Rochester Medical Center, New York, USA.

出版信息

Ear Hear. 1995 Jun;16(3):311-20. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199506000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00003446-199506000-00008
PMID:7672480
Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate morphologic differences in the ABR as a result of reversing the stimulus polarity of frequency-limited single-cycle stimuli in normal-hearing subjects. The results clearly demonstrate that large latency differences occur between condensation and rarefaction stimuli for low-frequency stimuli. It is believed that polarity-specific latencies are a result of the highly phase-sensitive neural elements tuned to low-frequency stimuli. In the majority of test subjects the rarefaction stimulus produced shorter absolute wave latencies; however, in a small number of subjects, significantly shorter latencies were elicited with the condensation stimulus. It is believed that differences may occur from varying summation patterns of inner hair cell depolarization between subjects which would be consistent over time within the same subject.

摘要

本研究旨在调查正常听力受试者中,由于频率受限的单周期刺激的刺激极性反转而导致的听性脑干反应(ABR)的形态学差异。结果清楚地表明,低频刺激的压缩刺激和稀疏刺激之间存在较大的潜伏期差异。据信,极性特异性潜伏期是由于高度相位敏感的神经元元件被调谐到低频刺激的结果。在大多数测试受试者中,稀疏刺激产生的绝对波潜伏期较短;然而,在少数受试者中,压缩刺激引发的潜伏期明显更短。据信,受试者之间内毛细胞去极化的总和模式不同可能会导致差异,并且在同一受试者内这种差异会随时间保持一致。

相似文献

1
The effects of reversing the polarity of frequency-limited single-cycle stimuli on the human auditory brain stem response.改变限频单周期刺激的极性对人类听觉脑干反应的影响。
Ear Hear. 1995 Jun;16(3):311-20. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199506000-00008.
2
Effects of stimulus phase on the normal auditory brainstem response.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Feb;35(1):167-74. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3501.167.
3
Effects of repetition rate, phase, and frequency on the auditory brainstem response in neonates and adults.重复率、相位和频率对新生儿及成人听觉脑干反应的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Apr;9(2):134-40.
4
Variable effects of click polarity on auditory brain-stem response latencies: analyses of narrow-band ABRs suggest possible explanations.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Jul;100(1):458-72. doi: 10.1121/1.415858.
5
Improving the frequency specificity of the auditory brain stem response.
Ear Hear. 1992 Aug;13(4):223-7. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199208000-00002.
6
Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.结合使用点击诱发和短纯音诱发的听觉脑干反应测量来估计纯音阈值。
Ear Hear. 2006 Feb;27(1):60-74. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000194511.14740.9c.
7
The hamster's auditory brain stem response as a function of stimulus intensity, tone burst frequency, and hearing loss.仓鼠的听觉脑干反应与刺激强度、短纯音频率及听力损失的关系。
Ear Hear. 1993 Aug;14(4):249-57. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199308000-00004.
8
Towards optimal selection of stimuli polarity method for effective evoking auditory brainstem responses.针对有效诱发听觉脑干反应的刺激极性方法的最优选择。
J Integr Neurosci. 2021 Jun 30;20(2):297-305. doi: 10.31083/j.jin2002029.
9
A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.气导和骨导刺激诱发的听觉脑干反应阈值及潜伏期的比较。
Ear Hear. 1993 Apr;14(2):85-94. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199304000-00003.
10
Brainstem Evoked Potential Indices of Subcortical Auditory Processing After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤后皮质下听觉处理的脑干诱发电位指数。
Ear Hear. 2017 Jul/Aug;38(4):e200-e214. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000411.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Stimulus Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem Response From Level-Specific Chirp.刺激极性对特定强度线性调频声诱发的听觉脑干反应的影响
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Oct;25(4):199-208. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00248. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Effect of Stimulus Polarity on Speech Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response.刺激极性对言语诱发听觉脑干反应的影响。
Audiol Res. 2014 Jan 3;3(1):e8. doi: 10.4081/audiores.2013.e8. eCollection 2013 Jan 2.
3
Contrasting phase effects on vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) produced by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.
气导和骨导刺激产生的前庭诱发肌源性电位(VEMPs)的对比相位效应。
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Jan;234(1):141-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-015-4441-3. Epub 2015 Sep 24.
4
Polarity stimulation effects on brainstem auditory evoked potentials.极性刺激对脑干听觉诱发电位的影响。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep-Oct;74(5):725-730. doi: 10.1016/S1808-8694(15)31383-5.