• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

管理式医疗环境中的创伤中心。

Trauma centers in a managed care environment.

作者信息

Campbell A R, Vittinghoff E, Morabito D, Paine M, Shagoury C, Praetz P, Grey D, McAninch J W, Schecter W P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, USA.

出版信息

J Trauma. 1995 Aug;39(2):246-51; discussion 251-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00010.

DOI:10.1097/00005373-199508000-00010
PMID:7674392
Abstract

Health care reform will affect the relationship of trauma centers to health maintenance organizations and other managed care plans. We studied Kaiser Permanente Medical Center (Kaiser) members admitted to the Trauma Center at San Francisco General Hospital (SFGH) to determine: (1) variables predicting transfer from SFGH to a Kaiser Hospital (repatriation), (2) the length of hospital stay (LOS), and (3) the cost of their care. The SFGH trauma registry provided data on 7,794 patients admitted before 1994. To investigate LOS, 89 Kaiser patients over 1 year were matched with non-Kaiser patients on age, maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale score (MAIS) by body region, Injury Severity Score (ISS), head injury severity, and blunt or penetrating injury and disposition. Kaiser patients were significantly younger, more likely to have blunt injury, and had a lower death rate. Significant predictors of repatriation were an MAIS score > or = 3, abdominal or extremity injury, and an ISS score of 26 to 40. The mean LOS for all Kaiser patients was 7.6 days, compared with 4.8 for controls (p = 0.20). However, mean LOS was significantly longer in repatriated Kaiser patients compared with controls (16 vs. 7.8 days, p < 0.0005). Kaiser reimbursement rates were comparable with commercial payors, but higher than others. A relatively small number of severely injured patients account for a large percentage of costly trauma care. Analyses of patient subsets are necessary for trauma centers to negotiate suitable relationships with managed care plans. A prospective study is needed to examine the cost efficiency of early transfer of managed care patients.

摘要

医疗保健改革将影响创伤中心与健康维护组织及其他管理式医疗计划之间的关系。我们研究了入住旧金山综合医院(SFGH)创伤中心的凯撒永久医疗中心(Kaiser)成员,以确定:(1)预测从SFGH转至凯撒医院(遣返)的变量,(2)住院时间(LOS),以及(3)其护理费用。SFGH创伤登记处提供了1994年之前入院的7794名患者的数据。为研究LOS,将89名1岁以上的凯撒患者与非凯撒患者在年龄、按身体部位划分的最高简明损伤定级标准评分(MAIS)、损伤严重度评分(ISS)、头部损伤严重程度以及钝性或穿透性损伤及处置情况方面进行匹配。凯撒患者明显更年轻,更有可能遭受钝性损伤,且死亡率更低。遣返的显著预测因素为MAIS评分≥3、腹部或四肢损伤以及ISS评分为26至40。所有凯撒患者的平均LOS为7.6天,而对照组为4.8天(p = 0.20)。然而,与对照组相比,遣返的凯撒患者的平均LOS显著更长(16天对7.8天,p < 0.0005)。凯撒的报销率与商业支付方相当,但高于其他支付方。相对少数的重伤患者占创伤护理高昂费用的很大比例。创伤中心需要对患者亚组进行分析,以便与管理式医疗计划协商合适的关系。需要进行一项前瞻性研究来考察管理式医疗患者早期转移的成本效益。

相似文献

1
Trauma centers in a managed care environment.管理式医疗环境中的创伤中心。
J Trauma. 1995 Aug;39(2):246-51; discussion 251-3. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199508000-00010.
2
Comparison of the new Exponential Injury Severity Score with the Injury Severity Score and the New Injury Severity Score in trauma patients: A cross-sectional study.新指数损伤严重度评分与损伤严重度评分及新损伤严重度评分在创伤患者中的比较:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187871. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187871. eCollection 2017.
3
Trauma centers strong financial contenders.创伤中心是强大的财务竞争者。
Patient Focus Care Satisf. 1998 Sep;6(9):110-2.
4
Trauma center finances and length of stay: identifying a profitability inflection point.创伤中心的财务状况和住院时间:确定盈利能力的转折点。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):817-21, 821-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.01.030.
5
Outcome and cost of trauma among the elderly: a real-life model of a single-payer reimbursement system.老年人创伤的结局与成本:单一支付者报销系统的真实模型
J Trauma. 1998 Oct;45(4):800-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199810000-00033.
6
Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation.创伤护理区域化:一项过程-结果评估
J Trauma. 1999 Apr;46(4):565-79; discussion 579-81. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199904000-00004.
7
Unregulated proliferation of trauma centers undermines cost efficiency of population-based injury control.创伤中心的无监管过度扩张破坏了基于人群的伤害控制的成本效益。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Mar;76(3):576-9; discussion 579-81. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000125.
8
Are all trauma centers created equal? Level 1 to level 1 trauma center patient transfers in the setting of rapid trauma center proliferation.所有创伤中心都一样吗?在快速创伤中心扩张的背景下,1 级创伤中心与 1 级创伤中心之间的患者转院。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Nov;89(5):920-925. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002738.
9
Teen trauma without the drama: outcomes of adolescents treated at Ohio adult versus pediatric trauma centers.青少年创伤无戏剧化:在俄亥俄州成人和儿科创伤中心治疗的青少年的结果。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):109-16; discussion 116. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000277.
10
The effect of resident duty hour restriction on trauma center outcomes in teaching hospitals in the state of Pennsylvania.宾夕法尼亚州教学医院住院医师值班时长限制对创伤中心治疗效果的影响。
J Trauma. 2010 Sep;69(3):607-12; discussion 612-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e51211.

引用本文的文献

1
Trauma centers: an underfunded but essential asset to the community.创伤中心:社区中资金不足但至关重要的资产。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Jul 4;9(1):e001436. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001436. eCollection 2024.
2
Trauma service cost: the real story.创伤服务成本:真实情况。
Ann Surg. 1998 May;227(5):720-4; discussion 724-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199805000-00012.