• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Prophylactic Greenfield filter placement in selected high-risk trauma patients.

作者信息

Khansarinia S, Dennis J W, Veldenz H C, Butcher J L, Hartland L

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center/Jacksonville 32209, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 1995 Sep;22(3):231-5; discussion 235-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70135-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70135-4
PMID:7674465
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pulmonary embolus (PE) remains a major factor in morbidity and death in severely injured patients, especially those in specific high-risk groups. PEs have been documented to occur despite routine deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic Greenfield filter (PGF) placement in patients who have multiple trauma with known high-risk injuries for PE.

METHODS

From January 1992 to June 1994, PGF were prospectively placed in 108 patients who had an injury severity score greater than 9 and met one of the following criteria: (1) severe head injury with prolonged ventilator dependence, (2) severe head injury with multiple lower extremity fractures, (3) spinal cord injury with or without paralysis, (4) major abdominal or pelvic penetrating venous injury, (5) pelvic fracture with lower extremity fractures. These patients were compared with 216 patients, historically matched for age, sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score, and days in the intensive care unit. Data analysis was done with chi-squared and Student's t testing.

RESULT

There were no statistical differences between the PGF and control group with regard to age (35.9 +/- 1.5 vs 38.3 +/- 1.4), sex (male 76% vs 75.5%), days in the intensive care unit (21.2 +/- 1.4 vs 18.1 +/- 1.5), ISS (28.0 +/- 1.0 vs 25.4 +/- 0.8) and mechanism of injury (blunt 85% vs 81%). None of the patients in the PGF group had a PE. In the control group, however, 13 patients had a PE, nine of which were fatal. These differences were statistically significant for both PE (p < 0.009) and PE-related death (p < 0.03). The overall mortality rate was reduced in the PGF group (18 of 108, 16%) versus the control group (47 of 216, 22%); however, this did not achieve statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

PGF insertion in selected patients at high risk who had trauma effectively prevented both fatal and nonfatal PE. The lower incidence of fatal PE in the PGF group may have contributed to a reduction in the overall mortality rate. Patients who have trauma with high risk for PE should be considered for PGF placement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Prophylactic Greenfield filter placement in selected high-risk trauma patients.
J Vasc Surg. 1995 Sep;22(3):231-5; discussion 235-6. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70135-4.
2
Role of prophylactic temporary inferior vena cava filters placed at the ICU bedside under intravascular ultrasound guidance in patients with multiple trauma.在血管内超声引导下于重症监护病房床边放置预防性临时下腔静脉滤器在多发伤患者中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Nov;40(5):958-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.048.
3
Routine prophylactic vena cava filtration is not indicated after acute spinal cord injury.急性脊髓损伤后,不建议进行常规预防性腔静脉滤过。
J Trauma. 2002 May;52(5):902-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200205000-00013.
4
Comprehensive assessment of prophylactic preoperative inferior vena cava filters for major spinal reconstruction in adults.成人大型脊柱重建术预防性术前下腔静脉滤器的综合评估。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):1122-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824abde2.
5
Early placement of prophylactic vena caval filters in injured patients at high risk for pulmonary embolism.对有肺栓塞高风险的受伤患者尽早放置预防性腔静脉滤器。
J Trauma. 1996 May;40(5):797-802; discussion 802-4. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199605000-00020.
6
Prophylactic vena cava filter insertion in severely injured trauma patients: indications and preliminary results.严重创伤患者预防性置入下腔静脉滤器:适应证及初步结果
J Trauma. 1993 Oct;35(4):637-41; discussion 641-2. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199310000-00021.
7
Early lower extremity fracture fixation and the risk of early pulmonary embolus: filter before fixation?早期下肢骨折固定与早期肺栓塞风险:固定前放置滤器?
J Trauma. 2011 Jun;70(6):1381-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318215b928.
8
Prospective randomized study comparing the clinical outcomes between inferior vena cava Greenfield and TrapEase filters.前瞻性随机研究比较下腔静脉 Greenfield 与 TrapEase 滤器的临床结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Aug;52(2):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.02.280. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Efficacy of deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in trauma patients and identification of high-risk groups.创伤患者深静脉血栓形成预防的疗效及高危人群的识别。
J Trauma. 1993 Jul;35(1):132-8; discussion 138-9. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199307000-00021.
10
Prophylactic and therapeutic inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary emboli in trauma patients.预防性和治疗性下腔静脉滤器预防创伤患者肺栓塞
Arch Surg. 2002 May;137(5):521-5; discussion 525-7. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.5.521.

引用本文的文献

1
Saudi Critical Care Society clinical practice guidelines on the prevention of venous thromboembolism in adults with trauma: reviewed for evidence-based integrity and endorsed by the Scandinavian Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.沙特重症监护学会关于创伤成年患者静脉血栓栓塞预防的临床实践指南:经循证完整性审查并获斯堪的纳维亚麻醉与重症监护医学学会认可。
Ann Intensive Care. 2023 May 11;13(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13613-023-01135-8.
2
Venous Thromboembolism in Trauma: The Role of Anticoagulation and Inferior Vena Cava Filters.创伤中的静脉血栓栓塞:抗凝及下腔静脉滤器的作用
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2021 Mar;38(1):40-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1724013. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
3
Does prophylactic inferior vena cava filter reduce the hazard of pulmonary embolism and mortality in severe trauma? A single center retrospective comparative study.
预防性下腔静脉滤器能否降低严重创伤患者肺栓塞的风险和死亡率?一项单中心回顾性对照研究。
Eur J Radiol Open. 2020 Dec 10;8:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100299. eCollection 2021.
4
Vena caval filters for the prevention of pulmonary embolism.用于预防肺栓塞的腔静脉滤器
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 8;10(10):CD006212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006212.pub5.
5
American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prevention of venous thromboembolism in surgical hospitalized patients.美国血液学会 2019 年静脉血栓栓塞症管理指南:手术住院患者静脉血栓栓塞症的预防。
Blood Adv. 2019 Dec 10;3(23):3898-3944. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000975.
6
Prophylactic inferior vena cava filters for operative pelvic fractures: a twelve year experience.预防性下腔静脉滤器在骨盆骨折手术中的应用:十二年经验。
Int Orthop. 2019 Dec;43(12):2831-2838. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04384-0. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
WACEM Consensus Paper on Deep Venous Thrombosis after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.澳大利亚急诊医学学院关于创伤性脊髓损伤后深静脉血栓形成的共识文件。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2019 Apr-Jun;12(2):150-154. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_125_18.
8
Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Health Care Providers, 3rd ed.: Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine.脊髓损伤患者静脉血栓栓塞的预防:医疗保健人员临床实践指南,第3版:脊髓医学联合会
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2016 Summer;22(3):209-240. doi: 10.1310/sci2203-209.
9
Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol.可取出下腔静脉滤器对复杂损伤患者的获益与风险的详细评估:达芬奇多中心随机对照试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 12;7(7):e016747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016747.
10
Vena Cava Filter Use in Trauma and Rates of Pulmonary Embolism, 2003-2015.2003 - 2015年创伤中腔静脉滤器的使用及肺栓塞发生率
JAMA Surg. 2017 Aug 1;152(8):724-732. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.1018.