Suppr超能文献

评估和处理与酒石酸长春瑞滨(诺维本)相关的静脉刺激反应。

Assessing and managing venous irritation associated with vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine).

作者信息

Rittenberg C N, Gralla R J, Rehmeyer T A

机构信息

Ochsner Cancer Institute, New Orleans, LA, USA.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 May;22(4):707-10.

PMID:7675673
Abstract

PURPOSES/OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of duration of infusion time on venous irritation in patients receiving vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, NC) in combination with cisplatin or mitomycin.

DESIGN

Prospective and descriptive.

SETTING

Five outpatient hematology/oncology units in southern Louisiana and Mississippi.

SAMPLE

96 patients receiving vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin or mitomycin through a peripheral vein.

METHOD

Nurses completed the Venous Irritation Record (VIR), on which they documented the incidence of irritation reactions on the day of infusion as well as 24 hours and one to two weeks later.

MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES

Incidence and severity of venous irritation as well as the duration of administration.

FINDINGS

Significantly lower incidence of venous irritation at 6-10 minute infusion rate was observed (p < 0.05). No difference in incidence was observed when vinorelbine was given with a vesicant (mitomycin) or a nonvesicant (cisplatin) drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Although venous irritation is a problem associated with peripherally administered vinorelbine, it does not necessitate central line placement. Incidence of this problem can be reduced with a shorter duration of administration. The VIR was feasible, easy to use, and could be adapted for other drugs and other toxicities. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria are not adequate for grading venous irritation reactions.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Vinorelbine should be administered in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations as a 6-10 minute infusion. Determination of this rate came as a result of clinical nursing research. Nurses involved in clinical trials can and should play a role in describing emergent toxicities and investigating methods to prevent or minimize those toxicities.

摘要

目的

确定输注时间长短对接受酒石酸长春瑞滨(诺维本,百时美施贵宝公司,北卡罗来纳州三角研究园)联合顺铂或丝裂霉素治疗的患者静脉刺激性的影响。

设计

前瞻性描述性研究。

地点

路易斯安那州南部和密西西比州的五个门诊血液学/肿瘤学科室。

样本

96例通过外周静脉接受长春瑞滨联合顺铂或丝裂霉素治疗的患者。

方法

护士填写静脉刺激记录(VIR),记录输注当天以及24小时后和1至2周后的刺激反应发生率。

主要研究变量

静脉刺激的发生率和严重程度以及给药持续时间。

结果

观察到输注速度为6 - 10分钟时静脉刺激发生率显著降低(p < 0.05)。长春瑞滨与发泡剂(丝裂霉素)或非发泡剂(顺铂)药物联合使用时,发生率无差异。

结论

虽然静脉刺激是外周给予长春瑞滨相关的一个问题,但不一定需要放置中心静脉导管。缩短给药持续时间可降低该问题的发生率。VIR可行、易于使用,并且可适用于其他药物和其他毒性反应。美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性标准不足以对静脉刺激反应进行分级。

对护理实践的启示

长春瑞滨应按照制造商的建议以6 - 10分钟的输注时间给药。该输注速度是临床护理研究得出的结果。参与临床试验的护士能够且应该在描述新出现的毒性反应以及研究预防或最小化这些毒性反应的方法方面发挥作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验