Lerch M M, Saluja A K, Rünzi M, Dawra R, Saluja M, Steer M L
Harvard Medical School, Harvard Digestive Diseases Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gastroenterology. 1993 Mar;104(3):853-61. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(93)91022-a.
The common channel theory suggests that bile reflux, through a common biliopancreatic channel, triggers acute pancreatitis. In the present study, this controversial issue was evaluated using an experimental model of hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis.
American opossums underwent ligation of the pancreatic duct alone, bile and pancreatic duct separately, or common biliopancreatic duct; the severity of pancreatitis was evaluated at selected times after ligation.
Animals in all three experimental groups developed hemorrhagic necrotizing pancreatitis; the severity of pancreatitis was similar in each group, although only those subjected to common biliopancreatic duct ligation experienced bile reflux.
Bile reflux into the pancreatic duct, via a common biliopancreatic channel, is not necessary for the development of pancreatitis and does not worsen the severity of pancreatitis associated with pancreatic duct obstruction in this model.
共同通道理论认为,胆汁通过共同的胆胰管通道反流会引发急性胰腺炎。在本研究中,使用出血性坏死性胰腺炎实验模型对这一有争议的问题进行了评估。
对美洲负鼠分别进行单纯胰管结扎、胆管和胰管分别结扎或胆胰管共同结扎;在结扎后的选定时间评估胰腺炎的严重程度。
所有三个实验组的动物均发生了出血性坏死性胰腺炎;每组胰腺炎的严重程度相似,尽管只有接受胆胰管共同结扎的动物出现了胆汁反流。
在该模型中,胆汁通过共同的胆胰管通道反流至胰管并非胰腺炎发生的必要条件,也不会加重与胰管梗阻相关的胰腺炎严重程度。