Esteban J M, Paxton R, Mehta P, Battifora H, Shively J E
Division of Pathology, City of Hope National Medical Center 91010.
Hum Pathol. 1993 Mar;24(3):322-8. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(93)90044-h.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is one of the better-studied oncodevelopmental antigens to which numerous monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) have been generated. Many of these MoAbs have been recently grouped (Gold classification) according to their epitope recognition. The present study was designed to immunocharacterize various MoAbs, each representative of the five Gold groups, on colorectal cancers and normal tissues using semiquantitative immunohistochemistry. Sensitivity, based on the number of colorectal cancer cases (n = 100) with positive reaction (> 5% cells), was greater with Gold groups 1 and 2 (93% each) than with groups 3, 4, and 5 (78%, 83%, and 87%, respectively). The intensity of the strain also correlated with the Gold groups, with 24%, 20%, and 18% of cancer cases displaying weak or negative staining (0 or 1+) when reacted with MoAbs from groups 3, 4, and 5, respectively, versus 6% and 12% with Gold 1 and 2 antibodies. Cross-reactivity of the anti-CEA antibodies with CEA-related molecules was found to be significant with Gold 5 antibody, which stained most of the normal lung, liver, stomach, and intestinal tissues tested. Strong staining also was seen in granulocytes when they were reacted with Gold 4 and 5 antibodies. The other antibodies showed much less and variable cross-reactivity with normal tissues, with a not statistically significant advantage for Gold 1 antibodies. In addition to lower sensitivity in CEA detection, Gold 3 to 5 MoAbs were less specific due to cross-reaction with one or more of the CEA-related macromolecules expressed by normal tissues. Based on these results and given the broad clinical applications of anti-CEA MoAbs, it is essential to characterize each MoAb to be used for clinical purposes in order to avoid interpretation errors of potential relevance resulting from poor sensitivity/specificity. The use of antibodies that recognize the epitope of group 1 or 2 is recommended to maximize sensitivity and specificity for CEA detection.
癌胚抗原(CEA)是研究较为深入的肿瘤发育抗原之一,针对该抗原已产生了众多单克隆抗体(MoAb)。最近,其中许多单克隆抗体已根据其表位识别进行了分类(戈尔德分类法)。本研究旨在使用半定量免疫组织化学方法,对代表戈尔德五个组的各种单克隆抗体在结直肠癌和正常组织上进行免疫特征分析。基于结直肠癌病例数(n = 100)且阳性反应(> 5%细胞)的敏感性,戈尔德第1组和第2组(每组均为93%)高于第3、4和5组(分别为78%、83%和87%)。染色强度也与戈尔德组相关,当与第3、4和5组的单克隆抗体反应时,分别有24%、20%和18%的癌症病例显示弱阳性或阴性染色(0或1+),而与戈尔德第1组和第2组抗体反应时分别为6%和12%。发现抗CEA抗体与CEA相关分子的交叉反应在戈尔德第5组抗体中较为显著,该抗体对大多数检测的正常肺、肝、胃和肠道组织进行了染色。当粒细胞与戈尔德第4组和第5组抗体反应时,也可见强染色。其他抗体与正常组织的交叉反应较少且变化不定,戈尔德第1组抗体虽有优势但无统计学意义。除了在CEA检测中敏感性较低外,戈尔德第3至5组单克隆抗体因与正常组织表达的一种或多种CEA相关大分子发生交叉反应而特异性较低。基于这些结果,鉴于抗CEA单克隆抗体广泛的临床应用,为避免因敏感性/特异性差而导致的潜在相关解释错误,对用于临床目的的每种单克隆抗体进行特征分析至关重要。建议使用识别第1组或第2组表位的抗体,以最大限度地提高CEA检测的敏感性和特异性。