Mauri F A, Caffo O, Veronese S, Verderio P, Boracchi P, Bonzanini M, Rossi N, Perrone G, Dalla Palma P, Barbareschi M
Department of Histopathology, SS Trinità Hospital, Borgomanero, Italy.
Br J Cancer. 1998 May;77(10):1661-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.273.
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is a well-known tumour marker whose immunohistochemical expression could be prognostically relevant in breast carcinomas. We evaluated CEA immunohistochemical expression, using the specific T84.66 monoclonal antibody, in a series of 252 consecutive cases of infiltrating breast carcinomas (104 N0, 148 N1/2) with median follow-up of 84 months. Oestrogen receptor (ER) status has been evaluated with the immunohistochemical method (ER1D5 antibody, 10% cut-off value): 121 cases were ER negative, 128 cases were ER positive and in three cases ER status was unknown. CEA staining was cytoplasmic; staining intensity and percentage of reacting cells were combined to obtain a final score (CEA score). The difference between the distribution of CEA score within the modalities of the other variables was not statistically significant. Univariate survival analysis has been performed on the series of node-negative and node-positive patients. In the latter subgroup, this has been performed separately for patients treated with systemic adjuvant hormonal therapy or chemotherapy. A multivariate analysis was only performed for node-positive patients treated with adjuvant therapy. CEA immunoreactivity was not prognostically relevant in any subset of analysed patients. The most important prognostic markers were nodal status and tumour size.
癌胚抗原(CEA)是一种著名的肿瘤标志物,其免疫组化表达可能与乳腺癌的预后相关。我们使用特异性T84.66单克隆抗体,对连续的252例浸润性乳腺癌病例(104例N0,148例N1/2)进行了CEA免疫组化表达评估,中位随访时间为84个月。采用免疫组化方法(ER1D5抗体,临界值为10%)评估雌激素受体(ER)状态:121例为ER阴性,128例为ER阳性,3例ER状态未知。CEA染色位于细胞质;将染色强度和反应细胞百分比相结合以获得最终评分(CEA评分)。CEA评分在其他变量模式中的分布差异无统计学意义。对淋巴结阴性和阳性患者系列进行了单因素生存分析。在后者亚组中,分别对接受全身辅助激素治疗或化疗的患者进行了分析。仅对接受辅助治疗的淋巴结阳性患者进行了多因素分析。在分析的任何患者亚组中,CEA免疫反应性与预后均无关。最重要的预后标志物是淋巴结状态和肿瘤大小。